Value of the prognostic nutritional index (PNI) in patients with newly diagnosed, CD5-positive diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: A multicenter retrospective study of the Huaihai Lymphoma Working Group.

<bold>Background: </bold>CD5-positive diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is a clinically rare subtype of DLBCL with aggressive clinical manifestations and a poor prognosis. It has been demonstrated that the prognostic nutritional index (PNI), an indicator of nutritional status and systemic inflammation, is a significant prognostic factor for several types of lymphoma. The objective of this multicenter retrospective study was to explore the prognostic value of the PNI in patients with CD5-positive DLBCL.<bold>Methods: </bold>In total, 207 patients with CD5-positive DLBCL were recruited from 11 centers of the Huaihai Lymphoma Working Group. Maximally selected rank statistics analysis was used to identify optimal cutoff points for the PNI. A Cox proportional hazards model was used for univariable and multivariable analyses. Kaplan-Meier curves were used to calculate survival rates and draw survival curves, and the log-rank test was used to compare differences between groups.<bold>Results: </bold>The median age at diagnosis was 61 years, and the 5-year overall survival rate was 47.5%. According to the maximally selected rank statistics analysis, a score of 49.7 was the optimal cutoff point for the PNI. Subgroup analysis showed that the PNI could re-stratify patients in BCL-2-negative, MYC-negative, high-intermediate-risk and high-risk International Prognostic Index, BCL-6-positive and BCL-6-negative, high Ki-67 score (≥0.9), Ann Arbor stage III/IV, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status ≥2, and germinal center B subgroups. Multivariable analysis revealed that PNI, age, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status, albumin level, and red blood cell count were independent prognostic factors for CD5-positive DLBCL.<bold>Conclusions: </bold>The PNI was a significant prognostic indicator for CD5-positive DLBCL and was able to re-stratify the prognosis for clinicopathologic subgroups of patients with CD5-positive DLBCL. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]