Back to Search Start Over

Sonographic risk assessment for an unplanned operative delivery: a prospective study.

Authors :
Perlman, Sharon
Schreiber, Hanoch
Kivilevitch, Zvi
Bardin, Ron
Kassif, Eran
Achiron, Reuven
Gilboa, Yinon
Source :
Archives of Gynecology & Obstetrics; Nov2022, Vol. 306 Issue 5, p1469-1475, 7p
Publication Year :
2022

Abstract

<bold>Purpose: </bold>To assess the value of pre-labor maternal and fetal sonographic variables to predict an unplanned operative delivery.<bold>Methods: </bold>In this prospective study, nulliparous women were recruited at 37.0-42.0 weeks of gestation. Sonographic measurements included estimated fetal weight, maternal pubic arch angle, and the angle of progression. We performed a descriptive and comparative analysis between two outcome groups: spontaneous vaginal delivery (SVD) and unplanned operative delivery (UOD) (vacuum-assisted, forceps-assisted and cesarean deliveries). Multivariate logistic regression with ROC analysis was used to create discriminatory models for UOD.<bold>Results: </bold>Among 234 patients in the study group, 175 had a spontaneous vaginal delivery and 59 an unplanned operative delivery. Maternal height and pubic arch angle (PAA) significantly correlated with UOD. Analysis of Maximum Likelihood Estimates revealed a multivariate model for the prediction of UOD, including the parameters of maternal age, maternal height, sonographic PAA, angle of progression (AOP), and estimated fetal weight, with an area under the curve of 0.7118.<bold>Conclusion: </bold>Sonographic parameters representing maternal pelvic configuration (PAA) and maternal-fetal interface (AOP) improve the prediction ability of pre-labor models for a UOD. These data may aid the obstetrician in the counseling process before delivery. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
09320067
Volume :
306
Issue :
5
Database :
Complementary Index
Journal :
Archives of Gynecology & Obstetrics
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
159382321
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-022-06413-7