Back to Search Start Over

Comparison of the supraglottic airway device BlockBusterTM and laryngeal mask airway Supreme in anaesthetised, paralyzed adult patients: a multicenter randomized controlled trial.

Authors :
Gao, Xue
Liu, Ju-Hui
Chen, Chun-Mei
Wang, Yong
Wang, Zhong-Yu
Yan, Chun-Ling
Zuo, Ming-Zhang
Cao, Yu
Qiao, Xin
Huang, Ya-Qi
Liu, Pei-Chang
Zhang, Hui
Zhang, Jia-Qiang
Shen, Jun-Mei
Li, Chao
Wang, Yi
Sun, Yan-Yan
Song, Jian-Nan
Zhang, Xi-Zhe
Zhang, Yun-Long
Source :
Expert Review of Medical Devices; Aug2022, Vol. 19 Issue 8, p649-656, 8p
Publication Year :
2022

Abstract

This multicenter prospective, randomized controlled clinical trial compared the clinical performance of supraglottic airway device (SAD) BlockBuster<superscript>TM</superscript> and laryngeal mask airway (LMA) Supreme for airway maintenance in anesthetized, paralyzed adult patients. A total of 651 adult patients scheduled for elective surgery in 13 hospitals were randomly allocated into BlockBuster group (n = 351) or Supreme group (n = 300). The primary outcome was oropharyngeal leak pressure (OLP). Duration and ease of insertion, fiberscopic view of positioning, airway manipulations, and complications were also assessed. The OLP was significantly higher in BlockBuster group compared with Supreme group (29.9 ± 4.2 cmH<subscript>2</subscript>O vs 27.4 ± 4.3 cmH<subscript>2</subscript>O, p < 0.001). Success rate of insertion at the first attempt (90.2% vs 85.1%, p = 0.027), rate of optimal fiberscopic view (p = 0.002) and satisfactory positioning of SAD (p < 0.001) were significantly increased in BlockBuster group. Both SAD BlockBuster<superscript>TM</superscript> and LMA Supreme are safe, effective, and easy-to-use devices for airway maintenance in anesthetized, paralyzed adult patients, but the SAD BlockBuster<superscript>TM</superscript> is superior to LMA Supreme in terms of OLP, success rate at the first attempt, and fiber-optic view of positioning. The trial is registered at (ChiCTR-ONC-16009105). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
17434440
Volume :
19
Issue :
8
Database :
Complementary Index
Journal :
Expert Review of Medical Devices
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
159905491
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1080/17434440.2022.2130048