Back to Search Start Over

Low‐grade prostate cancer should still be labelled cancer.

Authors :
Iczkowski, Kenneth A.
Molina, Mariel
Egevad, Lars
Bostwick, David G.
van Leenders, Geert J.L.H.
La Rosa, Francisco G.
van der Kwast, Theodorus
Berney, Daniel M.
Evans, Andrew J.
Wheeler, Thomas M.
Leite, Katia R.M.
Samaratunga, Hemamali
Srigley, John
Varma, Murali
Tsuzuki, Toyonori
Lucia, Marshall Scott
Crawford, Elward David
Harris, Richard G.
Stricker, Philip
Lawrentschuk, Nathan
Source :
BJU International; Dec2022, Vol. 130 Issue 6, p741-743, 3p
Publication Year :
2022

Abstract

Prostate cancer, Gleason pattern 3, Gleason score 3 + 3 = 6, ISUP Grade Group 1, tumour grading, tumour classification Keywords: prostate cancer; Gleason pattern 3; Gleason score 3 + 3 = 6; ISUP Grade Group 1; tumour grading; tumour classification EN prostate cancer Gleason pattern 3 Gleason score 3 + 3 = 6 ISUP Grade Group 1 tumour grading tumour classification 741 743 3 11/14/22 20221201 NES 221201 Abbreviations ASAP atypical small acinar proliferation GS Gleason score ISUP International Society of Urological Pathology PIN prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia In a pair of recent articles [1,2], Eggener et al. revived the decade-old argument, which we refuted previously [3], that Gleason score 3 + 3 = 6 (GS6; International Society of Urological Pathology [ISUP] Grade Group 1) prostatic adenocarcinoma should no longer be labelled cancer. Low-grade prostate cancer should still be labelled cancer. [Extracted from the article]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
14644096
Volume :
130
Issue :
6
Database :
Complementary Index
Journal :
BJU International
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
160149419
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1111/bju.15886