Back to Search
Start Over
Low‐grade prostate cancer should still be labelled cancer.
- Source :
- BJU International; Dec2022, Vol. 130 Issue 6, p741-743, 3p
- Publication Year :
- 2022
-
Abstract
- Prostate cancer, Gleason pattern 3, Gleason score 3 + 3 = 6, ISUP Grade Group 1, tumour grading, tumour classification Keywords: prostate cancer; Gleason pattern 3; Gleason score 3 + 3 = 6; ISUP Grade Group 1; tumour grading; tumour classification EN prostate cancer Gleason pattern 3 Gleason score 3 + 3 = 6 ISUP Grade Group 1 tumour grading tumour classification 741 743 3 11/14/22 20221201 NES 221201 Abbreviations ASAP atypical small acinar proliferation GS Gleason score ISUP International Society of Urological Pathology PIN prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia In a pair of recent articles [1,2], Eggener et al. revived the decade-old argument, which we refuted previously [3], that Gleason score 3 + 3 = 6 (GS6; International Society of Urological Pathology [ISUP] Grade Group 1) prostatic adenocarcinoma should no longer be labelled cancer. Low-grade prostate cancer should still be labelled cancer. [Extracted from the article]
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 14644096
- Volume :
- 130
- Issue :
- 6
- Database :
- Complementary Index
- Journal :
- BJU International
- Publication Type :
- Academic Journal
- Accession number :
- 160149419
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1111/bju.15886