Diagnostic yield of MR myelography in patients with newly diagnosed spontaneous intracranial hypotension: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Objectives: To investigate the pooled diagnostic yield of MR myelography in patients with newly diagnosed spontaneous intracranial hypotension (SIH). Methods: A literature search of the MEDLINE/PubMed and Embase databases was conducted until July 25, 2021, including studies with the following inclusion criteria: (a) population: patients with newly diagnosed SIH; (b) diagnostic modality: MR myelography or MR myelography with intrathecal gadolinium for evaluation of CSF leakage; (c) outcomes: diagnostic yield of MR myelography or MR myelography with intrathecal gadolinium. The risk of bias was evaluated using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 tool. DerSimonian–Laird random-effects modeling was used to calculate the pooled estimates. Subgroup analysis regarding epidural fluid collection and meta-regression were additionally performed. Results: Fifteen studies with 643 patients were included. Eight studies used MR myelography with intrathecal gadolinium, and 11 used MR myelography. The overall quality of the included studies was moderate. The pooled diagnostic yield of MR myelography was 86% (95% CI, 80–91%) and that of MR myelography with intrathecal gadolinium was 83% (95% CI, 51–96%). There was no significant difference in pooled diagnostic yield between MR myelography and MR myelography with intrathecal gadolinium (p = 0.512). In subgroup analysis, the pooled diagnostic yield of the epidural fluid collection was 91% (95% CI, 84–94%). In meta-regression, the diagnostic yield was unaffected regardless of consecutive enrollment, magnet strength, or 2D/3D. Conclusions: MR myelography had a high diagnostic yield in patients with SIH. MR myelography is non-invasive and not inferior to MR myelography with intrathecal gadolinium. Key Points: • The pooled diagnostic yield of MR myelography was 86% (95% CI, 80–91%) in patients with spontaneous intracranial hypotension. • There was no significant difference in pooled diagnostic yield between MR myelography and MR myelography with intrathecal gadolinium. • MR myelography is non-invasive and not inferior to MR myelography with intrathecal gadolinium. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]