Surgeon Strategies to Patient-Centered Decision-making in Cancer Care: Validation and Applications of a Conceptual Model.

We sought to construct and validate a model of cancer surgeon approaches to patient-centered decision-making (PCDM) and compare applications of that model relative to surgical specialties. Ten PCDM strategies were assessed using a cross-sectional survey administered online to 295 board-certified cancer surgeons. Structural equation modeling was used to empirically validate and compare approaches to PCDM. Within the full sample, 7 strategies comprised a latent construct labeled, "physical & emotional accessibility," associated with surgeon approaches to PCDM (β = 0.37, p <.05). Three individual strategies were included: "expectations (Q4)" (β = 0.52, p <.05), "decision preferences (Q5) (β = 0.47, p <.05), and "access medical information (Q3)" (β = 0.75). Surgical specialties for subgroup analysis were classified as general/other (67.6%) or hepato-pancreato-biliary and upper gastrointestinal (HPB/UGI) (34.2%). For general/other surgeons, 7 individual strategies composed the model of surgeon approaches to PCDM, with "time (Q6) (β = 0.70, p <.001) and "therapeutic relationship building (Q9)" (β = 0.69, p <.001) being the strongest predictors. The HPB/UGI model included 2 latent constructs labeled "physical accessibility" (β = 0.72, p <.05) and "creating a decision-making dialogue" (β = 0.62) as well as the individual strategy, "effective communication (Q8)" (β = 0.51, p <.05). Although models of surgeon PCDM varied, there were 4 overlapping strategies, including effective communication. Tailoring models of PCDM may improve surgeon uptake and thus, overall patient satisfaction with their cancer care. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]