Back to Search Start Over

Effects of large aftershocks on spatial aftershock forecasts during the 2017–2019 western Iran sequence.

Authors :
Asayesh, Behnam M
Zafarani, Hamid
Hainzl, Sebastian
Sharma, Shubham
Source :
Geophysical Journal International; Jan2023, Vol. 232 Issue 1, p147-161, 15p
Publication Year :
2023

Abstract

On 12 November 2017, an earthquake with a moment magnitude of 7.3 struck the west of Iran near the Iraq border. This event was followed about 9 and 12 months later by two large aftershocks of magnitude 5.9 and 6.3, which together triggered intensive seismic activity known as the 2017–2019 Kermanshah sequence. In this study, we analyse this sequence regarding the potential to forecast the spatial aftershock distribution based on information about the main shock and its largest aftershocks. Recent studies showed that classical Coulomb failure stress (CFS) maps are outperformed by alternative scalar stress quantities, as well as a distance-slip probabilistic model (R) and deep neural networks (DNN). In particular, the R-model performed best. However, these test results were based on the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) metric, which is not well suited for imbalanced data sets such as aftershock distributions. Furthermore, the previous analyses also ignored the potential impact of large secondary earthquakes. For the complex Kermanshah sequence, we applied the same forecast models but used the more appropriate MCC-F<subscript>1</subscript> metric for testing. Similar to previous studies, we also observe that the receiver independent stress scalars yield better forecasts than the classical CFS values relying on the specification of receiver mechanisms. However, detailed analysis based on the MCC-F<subscript>1</subscript> metric revealed that the performance depends on the grid size, magnitude cut-off and test period. Increasing the magnitude cut-off and decreasing the grid size and period reduce the performance of all methods. Finally, we found that the performance of the best methods improves when the source information of large aftershocks is additionally considered, with stress-based models outperforming the R model. Our results highlight the importance of accounting for secondary stress changes in improving earthquake forecasts. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
0956540X
Volume :
232
Issue :
1
Database :
Complementary Index
Journal :
Geophysical Journal International
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
160696074
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1093/gji/ggac333