Back to Search Start Over

2022 American College of Rheumatology/EULAR Classification Criteria for Takayasu Arteritis.

Authors :
Grayson, Peter C.
Ponte, Cristina
Suppiah, Ravi
Robson, Joanna C.
Gribbons, Katherine Bates
Judge, Andrew
Craven, Anthea
Khalid, Sara
Hutchings, Andrew
Danda, Debashish
Luqmani, Raashid A.
Watts, Richard A.
Merkel, Peter A.
Gatenby, Paul
Hill, Catherine
Ranganathan, Dwarakanathan
Kronbichler, Andreas
Blockmans, Daniel
Barra, Lillian
Carette, Simon
Source :
Arthritis & Rheumatology; Dec2022, Vol. 74 Issue 12, p1872-1880, 9p
Publication Year :
2022

Abstract

Objective: To develop and validate new classification criteria for Takayasu arteritis (TAK). Methods: Patients with vasculitis or comparator diseases were recruited into an international cohort. The study proceeded in 6 phases: 1) identification of candidate criteria items, 2) collection of candidate items present at diagnosis, 3) expert panel review of cases, 4) data‐driven reduction of candidate items, 5) derivation of a points‐based classification score in a development data set, and 6) validation in an independent data set. Results: The development data set consisted of 316 cases of TAK and 323 comparators. The validation data set consisted of an additional 146 cases of TAK and 127 comparators. Age ≤60 years at diagnosis and imaging evidence of large‐vessel vasculitis were absolute requirements to classify a patient as having TAK. The final criteria items and weights were as follows: female sex (+1), angina (+2), limb claudication (+2), arterial bruit (+2), reduced upper extremity pulse (+2), reduced pulse or tenderness of a carotid artery (+2), blood pressure difference between arms of ≥20 mm Hg (+1), number of affected arterial territories (+1 to +3), paired artery involvement (+1), and abdominal aorta plus renal or mesenteric involvement (+3). A patient could be classified as having TAK with a cumulative score of ≥5 points. When these criteria were tested in the validation data set, the model area under the curve was 0.97 (95% confidence interval [95% CI] 0.94–0.99) with a sensitivity of 93.8% (95% CI 88.6–97.1%) and specificity of 99.2% (95% CI 96.7–100.0%). Conclusion: The 2022 American College of Rheumatology/EULAR classification criteria for TAK are now validated for use in research. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
23265191
Volume :
74
Issue :
12
Database :
Complementary Index
Journal :
Arthritis & Rheumatology
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
160813556
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1002/art.42324