Back to Search Start Over

How Gene–Culture Coevolution can—but Probably did not—Track Mind-Independent Moral Truth.

Authors :
Cofnas, Nathan
Source :
Philosophical Quarterly; Apr2023, Vol. 73 Issue 2, p414-434, 21p
Publication Year :
2023

Abstract

I argue that our general disposition to make moral judgments and our core moral intuitions are likely the product of social selection—a kind of gene–culture coevolution driven by the enforcement of collectively agreed-upon rules. Social selection could potentially track mind-independent moral truth by a process that I term realist social selection: our ancestors could have acquired moral knowledge via reason and enforced rules based on that knowledge, thereby creating selection pressures that drove the evolution of our moral psychology. Given anthropological evidence that early humans designed rules with the conscious aim of preserving individual autonomy and advancing their collective interests, the theory of realist social selection appears to be attractive for moral realists. The goal of evolutionary debunking arguments should be to show not that our moral beliefs are the product of natural selection, but that realist social selection did not occur. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
00318094
Volume :
73
Issue :
2
Database :
Complementary Index
Journal :
Philosophical Quarterly
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
162589601
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1093/pq/pqac047