Back to Search Start Over

Protecting the Vulnerable and Including the Under-Represented: IRB Practices and Attitudes.

Authors :
Gelinas, Luke
Strauss, David H
Chen, Ying
Ahmed, Hayat R.
Kirby, Aaron
Friesen, Phoebe
Bierer, Barbara E.
Source :
Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics; Feb-Apr2023, Vol. 18 Issue 1/2, p58-68, 11p
Publication Year :
2023

Abstract

Since their inception, Institutional Review Boards (IRBs) have been charged with protecting the vulnerable in research. More recently, attention has turned to whether IRBs also have a role to play in ensuring representative study samples and promoting the inclusion of historically under-represented groups. These two aims—protecting the vulnerable and including the under-represented—can pull in different directions, given the potential for overlap between the vulnerable and the under-represented. We conducted a pilot, online national survey of IRB Chairs to gauge attitudes and practices with regard to protecting the vulnerable and including the under-represented in research. We found that IRBs extend the concept of vulnerability to different groups across various contexts, are confident that they effectively protect vulnerable individuals in research, and believe that IRBs have a role to play in ensuring representative samples and the inclusion of under-represented groups. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
15562646
Volume :
18
Issue :
1/2
Database :
Complementary Index
Journal :
Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
162601269
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1177/15562646221138450