Back to Search Start Over

Effectiveness of intraoperative peritoneal lavage with saline in patient with intra-abdominal infections: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors :
Zhou, Qi
Meng, Wenbo
Ren, Yanhan
Li, Qinyuan
Boermeester, Marja A.
Nthumba, Peter Muli
Rickard, Jennifer
Zheng, Bobo
Liu, Hui
Shi, Qianling
Zhao, Siya
Wang, Zijun
Liu, Xiao
Luo, Zhengxiu
Yang, Kehu
Chen, Yaolong
Sawyer, Robert G.
Source :
World Journal of Emergency Surgery; 3/29/2023, Vol. 18 Issue 1, p1-13, 13p
Publication Year :
2023

Abstract

Background: Intraoperative peritoneal lavage (IOPL) with saline has been widely used in surgical practice. However, the effectiveness of IOPL with saline in patients with intra-abdominal infections (IAIs) remains controversial. This study aims to systematically review randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating the effectiveness of IOPL in patients with IAIs. Methods: The databases of PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane library, CNKI, WanFang, and CBM databases were searched from inception to December 31, 2022. Random-effects models were used to calculate the risk ratio (RR), mean difference, and standardized mean difference. The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) was used to rate the quality of the evidence. Results: Ten RCTs with 1318 participants were included, of which eight studies on appendicitis and two studies on peritonitis. Moderate-quality evidence showed that the use of IOPL with saline was not associated with a reduced risk of mortality (0% vs. 1.1%; RR, 0.31 [95% CI, 0.02–6.39]), intra-abdominal abscess (12.3% vs. 11.8%; RR, 1.02 [95% CI, 0.70–1.48]; I<superscript>2</superscript> = 24%), incisional surgical site infections (3.3% vs. 3.8%; RR, 0.72 [95% CI, 0.18–2.86]; I<superscript>2</superscript> = 50%), postoperative complication (11.0% vs. 13.2%; RR, 0.74 [95% CI, 0.39–1.41]; I<superscript>2</superscript> = 64%), reoperation (2.9% vs. 1.7%; RR,1.71 [95% CI, 0.74–3.93]; I<superscript>2</superscript> = 0%) and readmission (5.2% vs. 6.6%; RR, 0.95 [95% CI, 0.48–1.87]; I<superscript>2</superscript> = 7%) in patients with appendicitis when compared to non-IOPL. Low-quality evidence showed that the use of IOPL with saline was not associated with a reduced risk of mortality (22.7% vs. 23.3%; RR, 0.97 [95% CI, 0.45–2.09], I<superscript>2</superscript> = 0%) and intra-abdominal abscess (5.1% vs. 5.0%; RR, 1.05 [95% CI, 0.16–6.98], I<superscript>2</superscript> = 0%) in patients with peritonitis when compared to non-IOPL. Conclusion: IOPL with saline use in patients with appendicitis was not associated with significantly decreased risk of mortality, intra-abdominal abscess, incisional surgical site infection, postoperative complication, reoperation, and readmission compared with non-IOPL. These findings do not support the routine use of IOPL with saline in patients with appendicitis. The benefits of IOPL for IAI caused by other types of abdominal infections need to be investigated. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
17497922
Volume :
18
Issue :
1
Database :
Complementary Index
Journal :
World Journal of Emergency Surgery
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
162755808
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13017-023-00496-6