Back to Search
Start Over
Effectiveness of intraoperative peritoneal lavage with saline in patient with intra-abdominal infections: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
- Source :
- World Journal of Emergency Surgery; 3/29/2023, Vol. 18 Issue 1, p1-13, 13p
- Publication Year :
- 2023
-
Abstract
- Background: Intraoperative peritoneal lavage (IOPL) with saline has been widely used in surgical practice. However, the effectiveness of IOPL with saline in patients with intra-abdominal infections (IAIs) remains controversial. This study aims to systematically review randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating the effectiveness of IOPL in patients with IAIs. Methods: The databases of PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane library, CNKI, WanFang, and CBM databases were searched from inception to December 31, 2022. Random-effects models were used to calculate the risk ratio (RR), mean difference, and standardized mean difference. The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) was used to rate the quality of the evidence. Results: Ten RCTs with 1318 participants were included, of which eight studies on appendicitis and two studies on peritonitis. Moderate-quality evidence showed that the use of IOPL with saline was not associated with a reduced risk of mortality (0% vs. 1.1%; RR, 0.31 [95% CI, 0.02–6.39]), intra-abdominal abscess (12.3% vs. 11.8%; RR, 1.02 [95% CI, 0.70–1.48]; I<superscript>2</superscript> = 24%), incisional surgical site infections (3.3% vs. 3.8%; RR, 0.72 [95% CI, 0.18–2.86]; I<superscript>2</superscript> = 50%), postoperative complication (11.0% vs. 13.2%; RR, 0.74 [95% CI, 0.39–1.41]; I<superscript>2</superscript> = 64%), reoperation (2.9% vs. 1.7%; RR,1.71 [95% CI, 0.74–3.93]; I<superscript>2</superscript> = 0%) and readmission (5.2% vs. 6.6%; RR, 0.95 [95% CI, 0.48–1.87]; I<superscript>2</superscript> = 7%) in patients with appendicitis when compared to non-IOPL. Low-quality evidence showed that the use of IOPL with saline was not associated with a reduced risk of mortality (22.7% vs. 23.3%; RR, 0.97 [95% CI, 0.45–2.09], I<superscript>2</superscript> = 0%) and intra-abdominal abscess (5.1% vs. 5.0%; RR, 1.05 [95% CI, 0.16–6.98], I<superscript>2</superscript> = 0%) in patients with peritonitis when compared to non-IOPL. Conclusion: IOPL with saline use in patients with appendicitis was not associated with significantly decreased risk of mortality, intra-abdominal abscess, incisional surgical site infection, postoperative complication, reoperation, and readmission compared with non-IOPL. These findings do not support the routine use of IOPL with saline in patients with appendicitis. The benefits of IOPL for IAI caused by other types of abdominal infections need to be investigated. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Subjects :
- IRRIGATION (Medicine)
ONLINE information services
MEDICAL databases
META-analysis
MEDICAL information storage & retrieval systems
CONFIDENCE intervals
PERITONITIS
ABDOMINAL abscess
SYSTEMATIC reviews
APPENDICITIS
SURGICAL complications
PATIENT readmissions
INTRA-abdominal infections
TREATMENT effectiveness
SURGICAL site infections
REOPERATION
RESEARCH funding
MEDLINE
PHYSIOLOGIC salines
EVALUATION
Subjects
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 17497922
- Volume :
- 18
- Issue :
- 1
- Database :
- Complementary Index
- Journal :
- World Journal of Emergency Surgery
- Publication Type :
- Academic Journal
- Accession number :
- 162755808
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1186/s13017-023-00496-6