Back to Search
Start Over
The bureaucratisation of Australian unions? Evidence from a national survey.
- Source :
- Journal of Sociology; Nov2000, Vol. 36 Issue 3, p291-314, 24p, 6 Charts, 2 Graphs
- Publication Year :
- 2000
-
Abstract
- Using data drawn from the authors' own 1996 Australian National Trade Union Survey, this paper examines the size and implications of union bureaucracies in Australia. In particular, we critically evaluate the arguments of Bramble (1995b) that the growth of Australia's 'new generation' of union officials has had the effect of 'deterring democracy'. We find that while the evidence of increasing numbers of union officials is mixed, there are some trends that are contributing to higher union official density rates while other trends are lowering those rates. However, we find no support for Bramble's central claims that union bureaucratisation and managerial-service unionism have led to less democratic practices in Australian unions. Rather than being concerned with the number or class character of officials, we suggest that organisational features such as delegate structures are more relevant to the issue of union democracy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Subjects :
- LABOR unions
BUREAUCRATIZATION
LABOR movement
DEMOCRACY
Subjects
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 14407833
- Volume :
- 36
- Issue :
- 3
- Database :
- Complementary Index
- Journal :
- Journal of Sociology
- Publication Type :
- Academic Journal
- Accession number :
- 16316148
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1177/144078330003600302