Back to Search Start Over

Economic Analysis of Methanating CO 2 and Hydrogen-Rich Industrial Waste Gas in Depleted Natural Gas Reservoirs.

Authors :
Hou, Zhengmeng
Huang, Liangchao
Xie, Yachen
Wu, Lin
Fang, Yanli
Wang, Qichen
Guo, Yilin
Source :
Energies (19961073); May2023, Vol. 16 Issue 9, p3633, 12p
Publication Year :
2023

Abstract

This study explored underground biomethanation as a means to achieve carbon neutrality and promote carbon circular utilization by methanating CO<subscript>2</subscript> and hydrogen-rich industrial waste gas in depleted natural gas reservoirs (MECHIG). This approach not only aids the development of carbon capture, utilization, and storage (CCUS) technologies, but also effectively processes industrial waste gas, thereby reducing pollutant emissions. In order to verify the feasibility of the MECHIG concept, this study builds upon the analysis of the MECHIG process overview and employs the net present value (NPV) analysis method to investigate its economic viability. Additionally, the study conducts a sensitivity analysis on six factors, namely methanation efficiency, facility site investment, hydrogen content in waste gas, natural gas prices, operation and maintenance (O&M) investment, and CO<subscript>2</subscript> capture and injection prices. The results indicate the following: (1) Under the baseline scenario, the NPV of the MECHIG concept is approximately CNY 5,035,100, which suggests that the concept may be economically viable. (2) The fluctuation in natural gas prices has the most significant impact on NPV, followed by facility site investment and methanation efficiency. In contrast, the variations in hydrogen content in waste gas, O&M investment, and CO<subscript>2</subscript> capture and injection prices have relatively smaller effects on NPV. (3) To ensure the economic feasibility of the concept, the acceptable fluctuation ranges for the factors of methanation efficiency, facility site investment, hydrogen content in waste gas, natural gas prices, O&M investment, and CO<subscript>2</subscript> capture and injection prices are −16.78%, 5.44%, −32.14%, −4.70%, 14.86%, and 18.56%, respectively. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
19961073
Volume :
16
Issue :
9
Database :
Complementary Index
Journal :
Energies (19961073)
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
163684702
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.3390/en16093633