Back to Search Start Over

Comparison of ventilation defects quantified by Technegas SPECT and hyperpolarized 129Xe MRI.

Authors :
Radadia, Nisarg
Friedlander, Yonni
Priel, Eldar
Konyer, Norman B.
Chynna Huang
Jamal, Mobin
Farncombe, Troy
Marriott, Christopher
Finley, Christian
Agzarian, John
Dolovich, Myrna
Noseworthy, Michael D.
Nair, Parameswaran
Shargall, Yaron
Svenningsen, Sarah
Source :
Frontiers in Physiology; 2023, p1-11, 11p
Publication Year :
2023

Abstract

Introduction: The ideal contrast agents for ventilation SPECT and MRI are Technegas and 129Xe gas, respectively. Despite increasing interest in the clinical utility of ventilation imaging, these modalities have not been directly compared. Therefore, our objective was to compare the ventilation defect percent (VDP) assessed by Technegas SPECT and hyperpolarized 129Xe MRI in patients scheduled to undergo lung cancer resection with and without pre-existing obstructive lung disease. Methods: Forty-one adults scheduled to undergo lung cancer resection performed same-day Technegas SPECT, hyperpolarized <superscript>129</superscript>Xe MRI, spirometry, and diffusing capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide (DL<subscript>CO</subscript>). Ventilation abnormalities were quantified as the VDP using two different methods: adaptive thresholding (VDP<subscript>T</subscript>) and k-means clustering (VDP<subscript>K</subscript>). Correlation and agreement between VDP quantified by Technegas SPECT and <superscript>129</superscript>Xe MRI were determined by Spearman correlation and Bland-Altman analysis, respectively. Results: VDP measured by Technegas SPECT and <superscript>129</superscript>Xe MRI were correlated (VDP<subscript>T</subscript>: r = 0.48, p = 0.001; VDP<subscript>K</subscript>: r = 0.63, p < 0.0001). A 2.0% and 1.6% bias towards higher Technegas SPECT VDP was measured using the adaptive threshold method (VDP<subscript>T</subscript>: 23.0% ± 14.0% vs. 21.0% ± 5.2%, p = 0.81) and k-means method (VDP<subscript>K</subscript>: 9.4% ± 9.4% vs. 7.8% ± 10.0%, p = 0.02), respectively. For both modalities, higher VDP was correlated with lower FEV<subscript>1</subscript>/FVC (SPECT VDP<subscript>T</subscript>: r = -0.38, p = 0.01; MRI VDP<subscript>K</subscript>: r=-0.46, p = 0.002) and DL<subscript>CO</subscript> (SPECT VDP<subscript>T</subscript>: r=-0.61, p < 0.0001; MRI VDP<subscript>K</subscript>: r = -0.68, p < 0.0001). Subgroup analysis revealed that VDP measured by both modalities was significantly higher for participants with COPD (n = 13) than those with asthma (n = 6; SPECT VDP<subscript>T</subscript>: p = 0.007, MRI VDP<subscript>K</subscript>: p = 0.006) and those with no history of obstructive lung disease (n = 21; SPECT VDP<subscript>T</subscript>: p = 0.0003, MRI VDP<subscript>K</subscript>: p = 0.0003). Discussion: The burden of ventilation defects quantified by Technegas SPECT and <superscript>129</superscript>Xe MRI VDP was correlated and greater in participants with COPD when compared to those without. Our observations indicate that, despite substantial differences between the imaging modalities, quantitative assessment of ventilation defects by Technegas SPECT and <superscript>129</superscript>Xe MRI is comparable. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1664042X
Database :
Complementary Index
Journal :
Frontiers in Physiology
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
163900888
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2023.1133334