Back to Search Start Over

Comparison of Cloud Structures of Storms Producing Lightning at Different Distance Based on Five Years Measurements of a Doppler Polarimetric Vertical Cloud Profiler.

Authors :
Sokol, Zbyněk
Popová, Jana
Skripniková, Kateřina
Torcasio, Rosa Claudia
Federico, Stefano
Fišer, Ondřej
Source :
Remote Sensing; Jun2023, Vol. 15 Issue 11, p2874, 16p
Publication Year :
2023

Abstract

We processed five years of measurements (2018–2022) of a vertically pointing radar MIRA 35c at the Milešovka meteorological observatory with the aim of analyzing the cloud structure of thunderstorms and comparing differences in measured data for cases when lightning discharges were observed very close to the radar position, and for cases when lightning discharges were observed at a greater distance from the radar position. The MIRA 35c radar is a Doppler polarimetric radar working at 35 GHz (Ka-band) with a vertical resolution of 28.9 m and a time resolution of approximately 2 s. For the analysis, we considered radar data whose radar reflectivity was at least 10 dBZ at 5 km or higher above the radar to ensure that there was a cloud above the radar. We divided the radar data into "near" data (a lightning discharge was registered up to 1 km from the radar position) and "far" data (a lightning discharge was registered from 7.5 to 10 km from the radar position). We compared the following quantities: (i) Power in co-channel (pow), (ii) power in cross-channel (pow-cx), (iii) phase in co-channel (pha), (iv) phase in cross-channel (pha-cx), (v) equivalent radar reflectivity (Ze), (vi) Linear Depolarization Ratio (LDR), (vii) co-polar correlation coefficient (RHO), (viii) Doppler radial velocity (V), (ix) Doppler spectrum width (RMS), and (x) Differential phase (Phi). Pow, pow-cx, pha, pha-cx, and V are basic data measured by the radar, while Ze, LDR, RHO, RMS, and Phi are derived quantities. Our results showed that the characteristics of the compared radar quantities are clearly distinct for "near" dataset from "far" dataset. Furthermore, we found out that there is a clear evolution close to the time of discharges of the observed radar quantities in the "near" dataset, which is not that obvious in the "far" dataset. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
20724292
Volume :
15
Issue :
11
Database :
Complementary Index
Journal :
Remote Sensing
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
164213211
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.3390/rs15112874