Back to Search Start Over

Dynamic Rupture Models, Fault Interaction and Ground Motion Simulations for the Segmented Húsavík‐Flatey Fault Zone, Northern Iceland.

Authors :
Li, Bo
Gabriel, Alice‐Agnes
Ulrich, Thomas
Abril, Claudia
Halldorsson, Benedikt
Source :
Journal of Geophysical Research. Solid Earth; Jun2023, Vol. 128 Issue 6, p1-27, 27p
Publication Year :
2023

Abstract

The Húsavík‐Flatey Fault Zone (HFFZ) is the largest strike‐slip fault in Iceland and poses a high seismic risk to coastal communities. To investigate physics‐based constraints on earthquake hazards, we construct three fault system models of varying geometric complexity and model 79 3‐D multi‐fault dynamic rupture scenarios in the HFFZ. By assuming a simple regional prestress and varying hypocenter locations, we analyze the rupture dynamics, fault interactions, and the associated ground motions up to 2.5 Hz. All models account for regional seismotectonics, topo‐bathymetry, 3‐D subsurface velocity, viscoelastic attenuation, and off‐fault plasticity, and we explore the effect of fault roughness. The rupture scenarios obey earthquake scaling relations and predict magnitudes comparable to those of historical events. We show how fault system geometry and segmentation, hypocenter location, and prestress can affect the potential for rupture cascading, leading to varying slip distributions across different portions of the fault system. Our earthquake scenarios yield spatially heterogeneous near‐field ground motions modulated by geometric complexities, topography, and rupture directivity, particularly in the near‐field. The average ground motion attenuation characteristics of dynamic rupture scenarios of comparable magnitudes and mean stress drop are independent of variations in source complexity, magnitude‐consistent and in good agreement with the latest regional empirical ground motion models. However, physics‐based ground motion variability changes considerably with fault‐distance and increases for unilateral compared to bilateral ruptures. Systematic variations in physics‐based near‐fault ground motions provide important insights into the mechanics and potential earthquake hazard of large strike‐slip fault systems, such as the HFFZ. Plain Language Summary: The Húsavík‐Flatey Fault Zone (HFFZ) is the largest strike‐slip fault in Iceland, located in the Tjörnes Fracture Zone in Northern Iceland where the largest earthquakes in Iceland have occurred. At present the seismogenic potential of HFFZ suggests that an earthquake of magnitude ∼7 is possible, which poses a high earthquake hazard in the region. In this study, we generate a set of plausible earthquake rupture scenarios on the HFFZ that account for multi‐physics, regional geology and topo‐bathymetry. We simulate the corresponding seismic ground motions by exploring various assumptions, for example, in terms of slipping fault geometry and hypocenter locations. Our simulated scenarios have comparable magnitudes with historic events. The physics‐based ground motion scaling conforms to new empirical ground motion models, but shows varying ground motion variability with distance. Our study provides an overview of multiple rupture scenarios on the HFFZ and suggests that an ensemble of physics‐based dynamic rupture scenarios can complement classical seismic hazard assessment methods to better characterize the hazard in tectonically and seismically complex regions, especially in data‐scarce regions. Key Points: Observational constrained dynamic rupture scenarios of the Húsavík‐Flatey Fault Zone match expected regional earthquake scaling and magnitudesSegmented fault geometry, hypocenter location, fault prestress and roughness affect rupture dynamics and ground motionsOur physics‐based scenarios show magnitude‐consistent average attenuation relationships and match empirical ground motion models [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
21699313
Volume :
128
Issue :
6
Database :
Complementary Index
Journal :
Journal of Geophysical Research. Solid Earth
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
164634918
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1029/2022JB025886