Back to Search
Start Over
Nature-Based Solutions for Carbon Neutral Climate Resilient Buildings and Communities: A Review of Technical Evidence, Design Guidelines, and Policies.
- Source :
- Buildings (2075-5309); Jun2023, Vol. 13 Issue 6, p1389, 17p
- Publication Year :
- 2023
-
Abstract
- The building sector is responsible for nearly 40% of the total global direct and indirect CO<subscript>2</subscript> emissions. Urban green infrastructure, which includes features such as urban trees, vegetation, green roofs, and green facades, are examples of nature-based solutions often employed as municipal climate mitigation and adaptation strategies. This approach offers a range of cost-effective strategies for reducing municipal CO<subscript>2</subscript> emissions and presents compelling public policy co-benefits such as improved urban livability and enhanced environmental conditions. For municipalities to confidently deploy these solutions at a scale necessary to achieve climate benefits, acquiring knowledge of quantifiable and demonstrated outcomes is an essential requirement. The objectives of this paper are to (1) provide a comprehensive analysis of the advantages and limitations of nature-based solutions (NBS) to address the challenge of reducing CO<subscript>2</subscript> emissions; (2) evaluate existing design guidelines and policies as may be available across Canada, and that that support the of implementation of NBS in urban agglomerations; (3) identify knowledge gaps and research needs to address challenges to the implementation of NBS. In this review, suggestions and requirements as presented in these documents are examined while giving due consideration to the scientific evidence available in research papers. It was found that the adoption of NBS can contribute to carbon neutral communities through reduced building energy consumption and carbon sequestration. Supportive guidelines and policies have been developed, or are in development, to promote the implementation of NBS at the city scale, despite challenges in assessing, quantitatively, their impact due to uncertainties in data, methods, and scale. Nonetheless, existing research provides sufficient evidence to qualify the measures and suggestions outlined in the guidelines and policies described in this paper. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 20755309
- Volume :
- 13
- Issue :
- 6
- Database :
- Complementary Index
- Journal :
- Buildings (2075-5309)
- Publication Type :
- Academic Journal
- Accession number :
- 164637642
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings13061389