Back to Search Start Over

Eukaryotes contribute more than bacteria to the recovery of freshwater ecosystem functions under different drought durations.

Authors :
Li, Chaoran
Miao, Lingzhan
Adyel, Tanveer M.
Huang, Wei
Wang, Jianjun
Wu, Jun
Hou, Jun
Wang, Zhiyuan
Source :
Environmental Microbiology; Jul2023, Vol. 25 Issue 7, p1363-1373, 11p
Publication Year :
2023

Abstract

Global climate change mostly impacts river ecosystems by affecting microbial biodiversity and ecological functions. Considering the high functional redundancy of microorganisms, the unknown relationship between biodiversity and ecosystem functions obstructs river ecological research, especially under the influence of increasing weather extremes, such as in intermittent rivers and ephemeral streams (IRES). Herein, dry–wet alternation experiments were conducted in artificial stream channels for 25 and 90 days of drought, both followed by 20 days of rewetting. The dynamic recovery of microbial biodiversity and ecosystem functions (represented by ecosystem metabolism and denitrification rate) were determined to analyse biodiversity–ecosystem–function (BEF) relationships after different drought durations. There was a significant difference between bacterial and eukaryotic biodiversity recovery after drought. Eukaryotic biodiversity was more sensitive to drought duration than bacterial, and the eukaryotic network was more stable under dry–wet alternations. Based on the establishment of partial least squares path models, we found that eukaryotic biodiversity has a stronger effect on ecosystem functions than bacteria after long‐term drought. Indeed, this work represents a significant step forward for further research on the ecosystem functions of IRES, especially emphasizing the importance of eukaryotic biodiversity in the BEF relationship. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
14622912
Volume :
25
Issue :
7
Database :
Complementary Index
Journal :
Environmental Microbiology
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
164682204
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1111/1462-2920.16370