Back to Search Start Over

Combining multi-isotope technology, hydrochemical information, and MixSIAR model to identify and quantify nitrate sources of groundwater and surface water in a multi-land use region.

Authors :
Zhao, Wanning
Yang, Deqing
Sun, Qiang
Gan, Yandong
Bai, Liyong
Li, Shuangshuang
Liu, Dongmei
Dai, Jiulan
Source :
Environmental Science & Pollution Research; Jul2023, Vol. 30 Issue 33, p80070-80084, 15p
Publication Year :
2023

Abstract

Accurate identification of nitrate (NO<subscript>3</subscript><superscript>−</superscript>) sources is the premise of non-point source pollution control in watersheds. The multiple isotope techniques (δ<superscript>15</superscript>N-NO<subscript>3</subscript><superscript>−</superscript>, δ<superscript>18</superscript>O-NO<subscript>3</subscript><superscript>−</superscript>, δ<superscript>2</superscript>H-H<subscript>2</subscript>O, δ<superscript>18</superscript>O-H<subscript>2</subscript>O), combined with hydrochemistry characteristics, land use information, and Bayesian stable isotope mixing model (MixSIAR), were used to identify the sources and contributions of NO<subscript>3</subscript><superscript>−</superscript> in the agricultural watershed of the upper Zihe River, China. A total of 43 groundwater (GW) and 7 surface water (SFW) samples were collected. The results showed that NO<subscript>3</subscript><superscript>−</superscript> concentrations of 30.23% GW samples exceeded the WHO maximum permissible limit level, whereas SFW samples did not exceed the standard. The NO<subscript>3</subscript><superscript>−</superscript> content of GW varied significantly among different land uses. The averaged GW NO<subscript>3</subscript><superscript>−</superscript> content in livestock farms (LF) was the highest, followed by vegetable plots (VP), kiwifruit orchards (KF), croplands (CL), and woodlands (WL). Nitrification was the main transformation process of nitrogen, while denitrification was not significant. Hydrochemical analysis results combined with NO isotopes biplot showed that manure and sewage (M&S), NH<subscript>4</subscript><superscript>+</superscript> fertilizers (NHF), and soil organic nitrogen (SON) were the mixed sources of NO<subscript>3</subscript><superscript>−</superscript>. The MixSIAR model summarized that M&S was the main NO<subscript>3</subscript><superscript>−</superscript> contributor for the entire watershed, SFW, and GW. For contribution rates of sources in GW of different land use patterns, the main contributor in KF was M&S (contributing 59.00% on average), while M&S (46.70%) and SON (33.50%) contributed significantly to NO<subscript>3</subscript><superscript>−</superscript> in CL. Combined with the traceability results and the situation that land use patterns are changing from CL to KF in this area, improving fertilization patterns and increasing manure use efficiency are necessary to reduce NO<subscript>3</subscript><superscript>−</superscript> input. These research results will serve as a theoretical foundation for controlling NO<subscript>3</subscript><superscript>−</superscript> pollution in the watershed and adjusting agricultural planting structures. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
09441344
Volume :
30
Issue :
33
Database :
Complementary Index
Journal :
Environmental Science & Pollution Research
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
164899376
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-023-27720-9