Cycle-based LQG knock control using identified exhaust temperature model.

Spark ignition engines are often desired to be operated close to their knock borderline when MBT (maximum brake torque) cannot be achieved for optimizing combustion efficiency. Under this circumstance, a calibrated baseline spark timing, along with other control parameters such as intake and exhaust valve timings, is found for the engine control system to maximize fuel economy, and a stochastic scheme can be used for the control based on a large number of history data. However, cycle-to-cycle combustion variations still exist, resulting in a relatively conservative baseline control. To reduce cycle-to-cycle combustion variations, a real-time cycle-wised knock compensation is required. The correlation between exhaust temperature at the current cycle and knock intensity at the next cycle was found in our earlier research. In this paper, a cycle-to-cycle spark timing compensation scheme is developed based on the measured exhaust temperature when the engine is operated close to its knock borderline. To make model-based control possible, q -Markov COVER (COVariance Equivalent Realization) system identification was used to obtain a linearized engine exhaust system model from incremental spark timing to associated exhaust temperature and knock intensity. Accordingly, a Linear–Quadratic–Gaussian (LQG) controller is designed, based on the identified model, to minimize the knock intensity fluctuations based on incremental exhaust temperature variation. The LQG control strategy was integrated with the existing entire knock control architecture, where the baseline spark timing is generated based on the offline machine training with an online updating scheme developed earlier, and demonstrated experimentally. Note that the cycle-based compensation only adds incremental spark timing to the baseline control so that knock combustion variations can be reduced. Three test scenarios are used to demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed cycle-to-cycle compensation scheme when the engine is knock-limited. With the help of cycle-to-cycle based compensation, it was demonstrated that engine spark timing can be further advanced about one crank degree while maintaining the same knock intensity up-limit due to reduced knock combustion variations. Note that this is corresponding to 0.5%–1.0% fuel economy for this engine when it is operated under knock condition. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]