Back to Search Start Over

Historical Changes and Reasons for Model Differences in Anthropogenic Aerosol Forcing in CMIP6.

Authors :
Fiedler, Stephanie
van Noije, Twan
Smith, Christopher J.
Boucher, Olivier
Dufresne, Jean‐Louis
Kirkevåg, Alf
Olivié, Dirk
Pinto, Rovina
Reerink, Thomas
Sima, Adriana
Schulz, Michael
Source :
Geophysical Research Letters; 8/16/2023, Vol. 50 Issue 15, p1-11, 11p
Publication Year :
2023

Abstract

The Radiative Forcing Model Intercomparison Project (RFMIP) allows estimates of effective radiative forcing (ERF) in the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project phase six (CMIP6). We analyze the RFMIP output, including the new experiments from models that use the same parameterization for anthropogenic aerosols (RFMIP‐SpAer), to characterize and better understand model differences in aerosol ERF. We find little changes in the aerosol ERF for 1970–2014 in the CMIP6 multi‐model mean, which implies greenhouse gases primarily explain the positive trend in the total anthropogenic ERF. Cloud‐mediated effects dominate the present‐day aerosol ERF in most models. The results highlight a regional increase in marine cloudiness due to aerosols, despite suppressed cloud lifetime effects in that RFMIP‐SpAer experiment. Negative cloud‐mediated effects mask positive direct effects in many models, which arise from strong anthropogenic aerosol absorption. The findings suggest opportunities to better constrain simulated ERF by revisiting the optical properties and long‐range transport of aerosols. Plain Language Summary: Aerosols are particles in the atmosphere with sizes ranging from nanometers to tens of micrometers, which are emitted by natural and anthropogenic processes or formed from gases in the atmosphere. The extent to which anthropogenic aerosols affect the radiation budget of Earth is important to better understand anthropogenic climate changes. Aerosol effects on the radiation budget are simulated by complex Earth system models that informed the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Our study addresses why such model experiments show different magnitudes for aerosol radiative effects. The results point to opportunities to further improve models with existing observations of aerosol optical properties and aerosol transport over oceans in addition to the much‐studied aerosol effects on clouds. Key Points: Coupled Model Intercomparison Project phase six (CMIP6) averaged trend in aerosol effective radiative forcing (ERF) is small for 1970–2014 and weakly positive for 2000–2014Positive direct aerosol radiative effects in CMIP6 models are associated with strong aerosol absorptionDiverse and often strong cloud‐mediated effects primarily determine the magnitude of aerosol ERF in CMIP6 [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
00948276
Volume :
50
Issue :
15
Database :
Complementary Index
Journal :
Geophysical Research Letters
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
169873143
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1029/2023GL104848