Back to Search Start Over

Mammographic Breast Density Model Using Semi-Supervised Learning Reduces Inter-/Intra-Reader Variability.

Authors :
Watanabe, Alyssa T.
Retson, Tara
Wang, Junhao
Mantey, Richard
Chim, Chiyung
Karimabadi, Homa
Source :
Diagnostics (2075-4418); Aug2023, Vol. 13 Issue 16, p2694, 12p
Publication Year :
2023

Abstract

Breast density is an important risk factor for breast cancer development; however, imager inconsistency in density reporting can lead to patient and clinician confusion. A deep learning (DL) model for mammographic density grading was examined in a retrospective multi-reader multi-case study consisting of 928 image pairs and assessed for impact on inter- and intra-reader variability and reading time. Seven readers assigned density categories to the images, then re-read the test set aided by the model after a 4-week washout. To measure intra-reader agreement, 100 image pairs were blindly double read in both sessions. Linear Cohen Kappa (κ) and Student's t-test were used to assess the model and reader performance. The model achieved a κ of 0.87 (95% CI: 0.84, 0.89) for four-class density assessment and a κ of 0.91 (95% CI: 0.88, 0.93) for binary non-dense/dense assessment. Superiority tests showed significant reduction in inter-reader variability (κ improved from 0.70 to 0.88, p ≤ 0.001) and intra-reader variability (κ improved from 0.83 to 0.95, p ≤ 0.01) for four-class density, and significant reduction in inter-reader variability (κ improved from 0.77 to 0.96, p ≤ 0.001) and intra-reader variability (κ improved from 0.89 to 0.97, p ≤ 0.01) for binary non-dense/dense assessment when aided by DL. The average reader mean reading time per image pair also decreased by 30%, 0.86 s (95% CI: 0.01, 1.71), with six of seven readers having reading time reductions. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
20754418
Volume :
13
Issue :
16
Database :
Complementary Index
Journal :
Diagnostics (2075-4418)
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
170737967
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics13162694