Back to Search Start Over

Unmet Needs in Real-World Advanced Therapy-Naïve and -Experienced Patients with Moderately to Severely Active Ulcerative Colitis in the United States.

Authors :
Afzali, Anita
Lukanova, Rina
Hennessy, Fritha
Kakehi, Sumie
Knight, Hannah
Milligan, Gary
Gupte-Singh, Komal
Source :
Advances in Therapy; Oct2023, Vol. 40 Issue 10, p4321-4338, 18p
Publication Year :
2023

Abstract

Introduction: Despite availability of advanced therapies (ATs) for ulcerative colitis (UC), many patients fail to respond to treatment. This study examined real-world clinical and humanistic outcomes associated with current treatments in patients with UC. Methods: This cross-sectional study used US data from the Adelphi Real World Disease Specific Programme for inflammatory bowel disease from before (2017–2018) and during the COVID-19 pandemic (2020–2021). Physicians (gastroenterologists) seeing > 5 patients/month reported patients' disease characteristics, current symptoms and treatments, and reasons for treatment choices for their next seven consecutive patients aged ≥ 18 years with moderately to severely active UC before current treatment. Patients were asked to complete the EQ-5D-5L health-related quality of life (HRQoL) measure. ATs included tumor necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFis), integrin receptor antagonists, interleukin-12/23 antagonists, and Janus kinase inhibitors. Patients were classified as AT-naïve or AT-experienced based on current treatment received for ≥ 8 weeks and further classified as responders or non-responders based on symptoms, disease flare status, and remission. Descriptive analyses are presented. Results: The 2017–2018 cohort included 92 physicians and 539 patients (208 [38.6%] AT-experienced). The 2020–2021 cohort included 73 physicians and 448 patients (349 [77.9%] AT-experienced). TNFis were the most common ATs. In 2017–2018, 195 (58.9%) AT-naïve and 113 (54.3%) AT-experienced patients were non-responders; in 2020–2021 this was 57 (57.6%) and 182 (52.1%). Efficacy and induction of remission were physicians' most common reasons for AT choice. Dislike of injections/infusions was the most common reason for eligible patients not receiving biologic therapy. Numerically, non-responders (both AT-naïve and AT-experienced) had more symptoms, overall pain and fatigue, and lower HRQoL scores than responders. Conclusions: Before (2017–2018) and during the pandemic (2020–2021), over half of patients with UC did not respond to AT. Non-responders carried a high burden of disease. Alternative therapies are urgently needed to treat UC. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
0741238X
Volume :
40
Issue :
10
Database :
Complementary Index
Journal :
Advances in Therapy
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
171916491
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12325-023-02605-y