Discrepancies of hadith and methods of Reconciliatingit Between Sheikhs Ibn Qutaybah (276AH) and Tusi (460AH) A Balancing Study.

The science of discrepancies of hadith task sciences needed by scientists and researchers in all sciences Sharia. This science needs hadith, jurist, fundamentalist and interpreter, each according to their specialization in the field of research in reaching the appropriate Sharia judgment in the matter presented to them. The disinterested and skeptics of the Sunnah of the Prophet and the enemies of the religion of the Nile and the deceitful for the hadith and challenge it, claiming the difference and contradiction between the hadiths of the Prophet Muhammad (PBUH) and the narratives contained about the imams of the people of the house(RA). Because of the importance of this science and to respond to the skeptics and appellants of the Sunnah, this study came to identify the approach of the two honorable sheikhs Ibn Qutaybah and al-Tusi in how to reconcile the difference and contradictions between the hadiths divided into a preamble and three demands. One of the most prominent findings of the study is that they agree and differ in some issues, and among the participants between them is their classification of two books in the Discrepancies of hadith, which are my book (the interpretation of the different hadith for Ibn Qutaybah) and the insight into what differed from the news for Tusi. They differ in several issues, the most prominent of which are that the ways to reconcile the difference between the hadiths in Ibn Qutaybah in his book are: 1-the plural 2-the copies 3-the preferences, while the ways to reconcile the difference between the hadiths in Tusi in his book were: 1-the preferences 2-the plural 3-the selection. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]