Back to Search Start Over

Pico-Light H2O: Intercomparison of in situ water vapour measurements during the AsA 2022 campaign.

Authors :
Ghysels, Mélanie
Durry, Georges
Amarouche, Nadir
Hurst, Dale
Hall, Emrys
Kensy Xiong
Dupont, Jean-Charles
Samake, Jean-Christophe
Frérot, Fabien
Bejjani, Raghed
Riviere, Emmanuel D.
Source :
Atmospheric Measurement Techniques Discussions; 10/10/2023, p1-30, 30p
Publication Year :
2023

Abstract

The mid-infrared lightweight stratospheric hygrometer, "Pico-Light H2O", the successor of Pico-SDLA H2O, is presented and its performances are evaluated during the AsA 2022 balloon-borne intercomparison campaign conducted at CNES Aire-sur-l'Adour (AsA) balloon launch facility and the Aeroclub d'Aire-sur-l'Adour. The Pico-Light instrument primarily been developed for sounding of the upper troposphere and stratosphere. Though, during the AsA 2022 campaign we expand the range of comparison including the lower troposphere additionally. Three different types of hygrometers and two models of radiosonde were flown, operated by the French Space Agency (CNES) and the NOAA Global Monitoring Laboratory (GML) scientific teams: Pico-Light H2O, the NOAA Frost Point Hygrometer (FPH), the micro hygrometer (in an early phase of development), M20 and iMet-4 sondes. In this frame, we intend to validate measurements of Pico-Light H2O through a first intercomparison with the NOAA FPH instrument. The in situ monitoring of water vapour in the UT-LS keeps being very challenging from an instrumental point of view because of the very small amounts of water vapour to be measured in these regions of the atmosphere. Between the lapse rate tropopause (11 to 12.3 km) and 20 km, the mean relative difference between water vapour mixing ratio measurements by Pico-Light H2O and NOAA FPH was (4.2 ± 7.7) %, mean tropospheric difference is was (3.84 ± 23.64)%, with differences depending on the altitude range considered. In the troposphere, relative humidity over water (RH) comparisons leads to an agreement between both Pico-Light and NOAA FPH of -0.2% on average, with excursions of about 30% RH due to moisture variability. Expanding the comparison to meteorological sondes, the iMet-4 sondes agree well with both Pico-Light and FPH between ground and 7.5 km (within ± 3% RH) and so does for M20 sondes, up to 13 km, which are wet biased by 3% RH and dry biased by 20% in case of saturation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
18678610
Database :
Complementary Index
Journal :
Atmospheric Measurement Techniques Discussions
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
172935417
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-2023-191