Timing of Implants use in a Backgrounding System.

A 2-year study conducted at the Eastern Nebraska Research and Extension Center near Mead, Nebraska determined the effects of backgrounding rate of gain and implanting during the winter or summer phases on animal performance and carcass traits. The study design was a 2 x 3 factorial arrangement with the factors of winter gain (0.45 or 0.90 kg/d; LG and HG, respectively) and three implant strategies. The implant strategies included a 36 mg zeranol (Ralgro; Merck Animal Health, De Soto, KS) implant during the winter phase and 40 mg trenbolone acetate and 8 mg estradiol (Revalor-G; Merck Animal Health) implant during the summer phase (STRNG), no implant during the winter phase and Rev-G during the summer phase (MED), and no implant during the winter or summer phases (NONE). The study used 240 (initial BW = 247 kg, SD = 5.9 kg YR 1; BW = 255 kg, SD = 10.9 kg YR 2) weaned steers each year that were fed one of two backgrounding diets consisting of bromegrass hay and 10% MDGS (LG) or 30% MDGS (HG). Steers were backgrounded in the feedlot for a 148-day winter phase followed by a 56-day summer phase where they grazed smooth bromegrass paddocks. Upon arrival in the feedlot for the finishing phase, steers received 200 mg TBA and 40 mg estradiol (Revalor-XS; Merck Animal Health) and were fed a common diet for the entire finishing phase. In the winter phase, steers fed the HG diet had a greater ADG, ending BW, DMI, and improved G:F over steers fed LG (P < 0.01). Steers that received a Ralgro implant during the winter phase (STRNG) were observed to have an 13% improved ADG (P < 0.01), a 10% increase in G:F (P < 0.01), and an additional 14 kg of BW for the winter phase. There were no interactions between the rate of gain and implant strategy (P = 0.15) during the winter period. In the summer, HG steers had maintained greater ending BW than LG, although LG steers had greater ADG than HG (0.70 and 0.53 kg, respectively; P < 0.01) due to compensatory gain. Steers assigned to HG during the winter phase had a greater IBW for the finishing phase. Steers fed HG during the winter and administered an implant at both backgrounding phases (STRNG) had the greatest HCW with no differences in ADG or G:F during the finishing phase. Combining a strong implant program and an increased rate of gain during winter backgrounding resulted in 34 kg of additional HCW at marketing. Implant strategy and rate of gain during the winter growing period had additive effects to increase animal performance through all phases. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]