Functional interaction of aortic valve and ascending aorta in patients after valve-sparing procedures.

Pressure recovery (PR) is essential part of the post stenotic fluid mechanics and depends on the ratio of EOA/A_A, the effective aortic valve orifice area (EOA) and aortic cross-sectional area (A_A). In patients with advanced ascending aortic aneurysm and mildly diseased aortic valves, the effect of A_A on pressure recovery and corresponding functional aortic valve opening area (ELCO) was evaluated before and after valve-sparing surgery (Dacron graft implantation). 66 Patients with ascending aortic aneurysm (mean aortic diameter 57 +/− 10 mm) and aortic valve-sparing surgery (32 reimplantation technique (David), 34 remodeling technique (Yacoub)) were routinely investigated by Doppler echocardiography. Dacron graft with a diameter between 26 and 34 mm were implanted. EOA was significantly declined after surgery (3.4 +/− 0.8 vs. 2.6 +/− 0.9cm²; p < 0.001). Insertion of Dacron prosthesis resulted in a significant reduction of A_A (26.7 +/− 10.2 vs. 6.8 +/− 1.1cm²; p < 0.001) with increased ratio of EOA/A_A (0.14 +/− 0.05 vs. 0.40 +/− 0.1; p < 0.001) and pressure recovery index (PRI; 0.24 +/− 0.08 vs. 0.44 +/− 0.06; p < 0.0001). Despite reduction of EOA, ELCO (= EOA corrected for PR) increased from 4.0 +/− 1.1 to 5.0 +/− 3.1cm² (p < 0.01) with reduction in transvalvular LV stroke work (1005 +/− 814 to 351 +/− 407 mmHg × ml, p < 0.001) after surgery. These effects were significantly better in patients with Yacoub technique than with the David operation. The hemodynamic findings demonstrate a valve-vessel interaction almost entirely caused by a marked reduction in the ascending A_A with significant PR gain. The greater hemodynamic benefit of the Yacoub technique due to higher EOA values compared to the David technique was evident and may be of clinical relevance. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]