Impact of supragingival scaling on the outcomes of subgingival instrumentation completed after 1 week: a split-mouth randomized clinical trial.

Objective: To investigate the impact of supragingival scaling on the clinical outcomes of subgingival instrumentation completed after 1 week. Method and materials: In 27 patients with Stage II and Stage III periodontitis, pairs of contralateral quadrants were randomly assigned into test group 1 (single sitting scaling and root planing) and test group 2 (supragingival scaling followed by subgingival instrumentation after lweek). Periodontal parameters were recorded at baseline, 2, 4, and 6months; Gingival crevicular fluid vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) estimation was done at baseline in both groups and 7 days after supragingival scaling in test group 2. Results: At 6 months, significantly better improvement in test group 1 at sites with periodontal probing depth (PPD)>5mm; (APPD = 2.32 mm vs 1.41 mm, P= .001; Aclinical attachmen level [CAL] = 2.34 mm vs 1.39 mm, P=.001) was observed. Supragingival scaling resulted in significant reduction in gingival crevicular fluid VEGF (42.46 to 27.88 pg/site) after lweek. Regression analysis explained 14% variance in VEGF to baseline PPD at sites with PPD>4 mm; and 21% variance in CAL improvement to VEGF at sites with PPD>5mm. The percentage of sites with PPD = 5 to 8 mm reachingthe clinical endpoint was 52% and 40%fortest group 1 and test group 2, respectively. Better results were noticed in bleeding on pocket probing-positive sites in both groups. Conclusion: The sites with PPD > 5 mm where supragingival scaling was followed by subgingival instrumentation after 1 weekresulted in less favourable treatment outcomes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]