Back to Search Start Over

Effects of far‐red light on the behaviour and reproduction of the zoophytophagous predator Macrolophus pygmaeus and its interaction with a whitefly herbivore.

Authors :
Meijer, Davy
Hopkoper, Syb
Weldegergis, Berhane T.
Westende, Wendy van't
Gort, Gerrit
van Loon, Joop J. A.
Dicke, Marcel
Source :
Plant, Cell & Environment; Jan2024, Vol. 47 Issue 1, p187-196, 10p
Publication Year :
2024

Abstract

Plants can detect neighbouring plants through a reduction in the ratio between red and far‐red light (R:FR). This provides a signal of plant–plant competition and induces rapid plant growth while inhibiting defence against biotic stress, two interlinked responses designated as the shade avoidance syndrome (SAS). Consequently, the SAS can influence plant–herbivore interactions that could cascade to higher trophic levels. However, little is known about how the expression of the SAS can influence tritrophic interactions. We investigated whether changes in R:FR affect the emission of herbivore‐induced plant volatiles (HIPVs), and whether these changes influence the attraction of the zoophytophagous predator Macrolophus pygmaeus. We also studied how the expression of the SAS and subsequent inhibition of plant defences affects the reproduction of M. pygmaeus in both the presence and absence of the greenhouse whitefly (WF) (Trialeurodes vaporariorum) as arthropod prey. The results show that changes in R:FR have little effect on HIPV emissions and predator attraction. However, a reduction in R:FR leads to increased reproduction of both the predator and the WFs. We discuss that shade avoidance responses can increase the population development of M. pygmaeus through a combination of reduced plant defences and increased herbivore densities. Summary statement: Changes in red and far‐red light (FR) have little influence on the emission of volatiles by tomatoes and also do not influence the attraction of the predatory bug Macrolophus pygmaeus. However, FR light does increase M. pygmaeus reproduction on tomatoes, both in the absence and presence of whiteflies (WFs) as arthropod prey. This is related to reduced plant defences in FR light and increased WF densities. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
01407791
Volume :
47
Issue :
1
Database :
Complementary Index
Journal :
Plant, Cell & Environment
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
173988512
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1111/pce.14723