Back to Search Start Over

Theoretical study of the Tetraaminelithium and Tetraaminesodium molecules complexed with H−, Li− and Na− anions: static and dynamic NLO parameters.

Authors :
Bekri, Lahcène
Elhorri, Abdelkader M.
Hedidi, Madani
Zouaoui–Rabah, Mourad
Source :
Journal of Molecular Modeling; Jan2024, Vol. 30 Issue 1, p1-19, 19p
Publication Year :
2024

Abstract

Context: This work focuses on the study of six molecules composed of the TetraAmineLithium (TALi<superscript>+</superscript>) and TetraAmineSodium (TANa<superscript>+</superscript>) structures linked with the anions H<superscript>−</superscript>, Li<superscript>−</superscript> and Na<superscript>−</superscript>. The NLO results obtained by these calculations showed significant values of static first hyperpolarizabilities (β<subscript>tot</subscript>) ranging from 8.74 * 10<superscript>−30</superscript> to 691.99 * 10<superscript>−30</superscript> esu. The two molecules TALi–Li and TALi–Na gave the highest values of static β<subscript>tot</subscript> equal to 563.20 and 691.99 * 10<superscript>−30</superscript> esu respectively and static second hyperpolarizabilities (γ<subscript>av</subscript>) of 680.02 and 779.05 * 10<superscript>−35</superscript> esu. The highest dynamic first hyperpolarizabilities (β<subscript>||</subscript>) values are around 1474080.00 * 10<superscript>−30</superscript> esu and 6,145,080.00 * 10<superscript>−30</superscript> esu at 720 nm lasers and which are attributed to the two molecules TANa–Li and TANa–Na respectively. Four molecules have push–pull behavior where the anions are donor groups, the Li<superscript>+</superscript>–NH<subscript>3</subscript> and Na<superscript>+</superscript>–NH<subscript>3</subscript> groups are acceptor groups and a bridge composed by the three remaining NH<subscript>3</subscript> ligands. The maximum wavelengths (λ<subscript>max</subscript>) in vacuum and in the presence of solvents for all molecules are in the range 240 to 870 nm. Method: The software used in this study is Gaussian 16. The optimizations of the molecules were calculated by B3LYP–D3/6–31 + + G(d,p). The static first hyperpolarizability (β<subscript>tot</subscript>) was calculated by different functionals: CAM–B3LYP, LC–wPBE, LC–BLYP, M11, wB97X, HSEh1PBE and M06–2X and the MP2 method, the basis–set used is 6–31 + + G(d,p). Other calculations of static β<subscript>tot</subscript> were carried out by the CAM–B3LYP functional combined with several basis–sets: 6–31G(d,p), 6–31 + + G(d,p), cc–pVDZ, AUG–cc– pVDZ, 6–311G(d,p), 6–311 + + G(d,p), cc–pVTZ and AUG–cc–pVTZ. The calculations of the first (β<subscript>||</subscript>) and second (γ<subscript>||</subscript>) hyperpolarizabilities in second harmonic generation (SHG) were calculated by CAM–B3LYP/6–31 + + G(d,p). The delocalization energies (E(2)) were determined by the NBO approach and calculated by the same functional and basis–set cited before. The solvation Gibbs energies (ΔG<subscript>solv</subscript>) were calculated using the implicit SMD model. Maximum wavelengths (λ<subscript>max</subscript>) and oscillator strengths ( f os ) were calculated by TD–CAM–B3LYP/6–31 + + G(d,p) in the presence of the implicit CPCM model. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
16102940
Volume :
30
Issue :
1
Database :
Complementary Index
Journal :
Journal of Molecular Modeling
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
174918070
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00894-023-05801-3