Back to Search Start Over

European Society of Cardiology guidelines and 1 year outcomes of acute heart failure treatment in Central Asia and Europe.

Authors :
Abdurashidova, Tamila
Müller, Martin
Schukraft, Sara
Soborun, Nisha
Pitta‐Gros, Barbara
Kikoïne, John
Lu, Henri
Chazymova, Zalina
Dzhorupbekova, Kanzaada
Beishenkulov, Medet
Tzimas, Georgios
Kirsch, Matthias
Vollenweider, Peter
Mean, Marie
Monney, Pierre
Hullin, Roger
Source :
ESC Heart Failure; Feb2024, Vol. 11 Issue 1, p483-491, 9p
Publication Year :
2024

Abstract

Aims: Outcomes reported for patients with hospitalization for acute heart failure (AHF) treatment vary worldwide. Ethnicity‐associated characteristics may explain this observation. This observational study compares characteristics and 1‐year outcomes of Kyrgyz and Swiss AHF patients against the background of European Society of Cardiology guidelines‐based cardiovascular care established in both countries. Methods and results: The primary endpoint was 1 year all‐cause mortality (ACM); the secondary endpoint was 1 year ACM or HF‐related rehospitalization. A total of 538 Kyrgyz and 537 Swiss AHF patients were included. Kyrgyz patients were younger (64.0 vs. 83.0 years, P < 0.001); ischaemic or rheumatic heart disease and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease were more prevalent (always P < 0.001). In Swiss patients, smoking, dyslipidaemia, hypertension, and atrial flutter/fibrillation were more frequent (always P ≤ 0.035); moreover, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) was higher (47% vs. 36%; P < 0.001), and >mild aortic stenosis was more prevalent (P < 0.001). Other valvular pathologies were more prevalent in Kyrgyz patients (P < 0.001). At discharge, more Swiss patients were on vasodilatory treatment (P < 0.006), while mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (P = 0.001), beta‐blockers (P = 0.001), or loop diuretics (P < 0.001) were less often prescribed. In Kyrgyz patients, unadjusted odds for the primary and secondary endpoints were lower [odds ratio (OR) 0.68, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.51–0.90, P = 0.008; OR 0.72, 95% CI: 0.56–0.91, P = 0.006, respectively]. After adjustment for age and LVEF, no difference remained (primary endpoint: OR 1.03, 95% CI: 0.71–1.49, P = 0.894; secondary endpoint: OR 0.82, 95% CI: 0.60–1.12, P = 0.206). Conclusions: On the background of identical guidelines, age‐ and LVEF‐adjusted outcomes were not different between Central Asian and Western European AHF patients despite of large ethnical disparity. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
20555822
Volume :
11
Issue :
1
Database :
Complementary Index
Journal :
ESC Heart Failure
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
174976537
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1002/ehf2.14591