Back to Search Start Over

Consensus on criteria for acromegaly diagnosis and remission.

Authors :
Giustina, Andrea
Biermasz, Nienke
Casanueva, Felipe F.
Fleseriu, Maria
Mortini, Pietro
Strasburger, Christian
van der Lely, A. J.
Wass, John
Melmed, Shlomo
Acromegaly Consensus Group
Banfi, Giuseppe
Barkan, Ariel
Beckers, Albert
Bidlingmaier, Martin
Boguszewski, Cesar
Brue, Thierry
Buchfelder, Michael
Chanson, Philippe
Chiloiro, Sabrina
Colao, Annamaria
Source :
Pituitary; Feb2024, Vol. 27 Issue 1, p7-22, 16p
Publication Year :
2024

Abstract

Purpose: The 14th Acromegaly Consensus Conference was convened to consider biochemical criteria for acromegaly diagnosis and evaluation of therapeutic efficacy. Methods: Fifty-six acromegaly experts from 16 countries reviewed and discussed current evidence focused on biochemical assays; criteria for diagnosis and the role of imaging, pathology, and clinical assessments; consequences of diagnostic delay; criteria for remission and recommendations for follow up; and the value of assessment and monitoring in defining disease progression, selecting appropriate treatments, and maximizing patient outcomes. Results: In a patient with typical acromegaly features, insulin-like growth factor (IGF)-I > 1.3 times the upper limit of normal for age confirms the diagnosis. Random growth hormone (GH) measured after overnight fasting may be useful for informing prognosis, but is not required for diagnosis. For patients with equivocal results, IGF-I measurements using the same validated assay can be repeated, and oral glucose tolerance testing might also be useful. Although biochemical remission is the primary assessment of treatment outcome, biochemical findings should be interpreted within the clinical context of acromegaly. Follow up assessments should consider biochemical evaluation of treatment effectiveness, imaging studies evaluating residual/recurrent adenoma mass, and clinical signs and symptoms of acromegaly, its complications, and comorbidities. Referral to a multidisciplinary pituitary center should be considered for patients with equivocal biochemical, pathology, or imaging findings at diagnosis, and for patients insufficiently responsive to standard treatment approaches. Conclusion: Consensus recommendations highlight new understandings of disordered GH and IGF-I in patients with acromegaly and the importance of expert management for this rare disease. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1386341X
Volume :
27
Issue :
1
Database :
Complementary Index
Journal :
Pituitary
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
175234737
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11102-023-01360-1