Back to Search Start Over

Enzalutamide versus Abiraterone Plus Prednisolone for Nonmetastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer: A Sub-Analysis from the ENABLE Study for PCa.

Authors :
Mita, Koji
Izumi, Kouji
Goriki, Akihiro
Tasaka, Ryo
Hatayama, Tomoya
Shima, Takashi
Kato, Yuki
Kamiyama, Manabu
Inoue, Shogo
Tanaka, Nobumichi
Hoshi, Seiji
Okamura, Takehiko
Yoshio, Yuko
Enokida, Hideki
Chikazawa, Ippei
Kawai, Noriyasu
Hashimoto, Kohei
Fukagai, Takashi
Shigehara, Kazuyoshi
Takahara, Shizuko
Source :
Cancers; Feb2024, Vol. 16 Issue 3, p508, 12p
Publication Year :
2024

Abstract

Simple Summary: The efficacy of abiraterone plus prednisolone (ABI) against nonmetastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) remains unclear. To evaluate enzalutamide and ABI as the first-line treatment for CRPC, we conducted the randomized controlled trial including both metastatic and nonmetastatic CRPC. As a sub-analysis, we focused on nonmetastatic CRPC in this study. ABI and enzalutamide had similar efficacy and safety profiles in patients with nonmetastatic CRPC. Enzalutamide (ENZ) and abiraterone plus prednisolone (ABI) can improve the survival of patients with castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC). However, the agent that is more effective against nonmetastatic CRPC remains unclear. To evaluate the agent that can be used as the first-line treatment for CRPC, an investigator-initiated, multicenter, randomized controlled trial (ENABLE Study for PCa) including both metastatic and nonmetastatic CRPC was conducted in Japan. The prostate-specific antigen (PSA) response rate, overall survival, some essential survival endpoints, and safety of patients with nonmetastatic CRPC were also analyzed. In this subanalysis, 15 and 26 patients in the ENZ and ABI arms, respectively, presented with nonmetastatic CRPC. There was no significant difference in terms of the PSA response rate between the ENZ and ABI arms (80% and 64%, respectively; p = 0.3048). The overall survival did not significantly differ between the two arms (HR: 0.68; 95% CI: 0.22–2.14, p = 0.5260). No significant differences were observed in terms of radiographic progression-free survival and cancer-specific survival between the ENZ and ABI arms (HR: 0.81; 95% CI: 0.35–1.84; p = 0.6056 and HR: 0.72; 95% CI: 0.19–2.73; p = 0.6443, respectively). Only four and six patients in the ENZ and ABI arms, respectively, had ≥grade 3 adverse events. ABI and ENZ had similar efficacy and safety profiles in patients with nonmetastatic CRPC. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
20726694
Volume :
16
Issue :
3
Database :
Complementary Index
Journal :
Cancers
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
175373775
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers16030508