Back to Search Start Over

An Open-Label, Randomized Trial Comparing Fidaxomicin With Oral Vancomycin for the Treatment of Clostridioides difficile Infection in Hospitalized Patients Receiving Concomitant Antibiotics for Concurrent Infections.

Authors :
Rao, Krishna
Zhao, Qianzi
Bell, Justin
Krishnan, Jay
Henig, Oryan
Daniel, Jolene
Sawaya, Kara
Albin, Owen
Mills, John P
Petty, Lindsay A
Gregg, Kevin
Kaul, Daniel
Malani, Anurag N
Pogue, Jason
Kaye, Keith S
Source :
Clinical Infectious Diseases; 2/15/2024, Vol. 78 Issue 2, p277-282, 6p
Publication Year :
2024

Abstract

Background Recurrent Clostridioides difficile infection (rCDI) occurs frequently, and concomitant antibiotic (CA) during the initial episode for treatment of non-CDI is a major risk factor. We sought to address the comparative efficacy of fidaxomicin versus vancomycin in the setting of CA during the initial CDI episode. Methods We conducted a randomized, controlled, open-label trial at 2 hospitals in Ann Arbor, Michigan. We consecutively consented and enrolled hospitalized patients ≥18 years old with diarrhea, a positive test for C. difficile , and ≥1 qualifying CA. Complicated CDI, CDI treatment for >24 hours prior to enrollment, and planned long-term (>12 weeks) CA use were notable exclusions. Clinical cure was defined as resolution of diarrhea for 2 consecutive days maintained until 2 days after therapy, and rCDI as recurrent diarrhea with positive testing ≤30 days after initial treatment. Patients were randomized to fidaxomicin or vancomycin. Results Baseline characteristics were similar in the 2 groups of 144 patients. Rates of clinical cure (73% vs 62.9%, P =.195) and rCDI (3.3% vs 4.0%; P >.99) were similar for fidaxomicin and vancomycin in the intention-to-treat and per-protocol cohorts, respectively. Only 4 patients developed rCDI. Conclusions In this study of patients with CDI receiving CA, a numerically higher proportion were cured with fidaxomicin versus vancomycin, but this result did not reach statistical significance. Overall recurrence was lower than anticipated in both arms compared with previous studies that did not extend duration of CDI treatment during CA. Clinical Trials Registration www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT02692651). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
10584838
Volume :
78
Issue :
2
Database :
Complementary Index
Journal :
Clinical Infectious Diseases
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
175522668
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/ciad606