Back to Search
Start Over
Validation of self-reported cardiovascular problems in childhood cancer survivors by contacting general practitioners: feasibility and results.
- Source :
- BMC Primary Care; 3/8/2024, Vol. 25 Issue 1, p1-11, 11p
- Publication Year :
- 2024
-
Abstract
- Background: Epidemiological studies often rely on self-reported health problems and validation greatly improves study quality. In a study of late effects after childhood cancer, we validated self-reported cardiovascular problems by contacting general practitioners (GPs). This paper describes: (a) the feasibility of this approach; and (b) the agreement between survivor-reports and reports from their GP. Methods: The Swiss Childhood Cancer Survivor Study (SCCSS) contacts all childhood cancer survivors registered in the Swiss Childhood Cancer Registry since 1976 who survived at least 5 years from cancer diagnosis. We validated answers of all survivors who reported a cardiovascular problem in the questionnaire. Reported cardiovascular problems were hypertension, arrhythmia, congestive heart failure, myocardial infarction, angina pectoris, stroke, thrombosis, and valvular problems. In the questionnaire, we further asked survivors to provide a valid address of their GP and a consent for contact. We sent case-report forms to survivors' GPs and requested information on cardiovascular diagnoses of their patients. To determine agreement between information reported by survivors and GPs, we calculated Cohen's kappa (κ) coefficients for each category of cardiovascular problems. Results: We used questionnaires from 2172 respondents of the SCCSS. Of 290 survivors (13% of 2172) who reported cardiovascular problems, 166 gave consent to contact their GP and provided a valid address. Of those, 135 GPs (81%) replied, and 128 returned the completed case-report form. Survivor-reports were confirmed by 54/128 GPs (42%). Of the 54 GPs, 36 (28% of 128) confirmed the problems as reported by the survivors; 11 (9% of 128) confirmed the reported problem(s) and gave additional information on more cardiovascular outcomes; and seven GPs (5% of 128) confirmed some, but not all cardiovascular problems. Agreement between GPs and survivors was good for stroke (κ = 0.79), moderate for hypertension (κ = 0.51), arrhythmias (κ = 0.41), valvular problems (κ = 0.41) and thrombosis (κ = 0.56), and poor for coronary heart disease (κ = 0.15) and heart failure (κ = 0.32). Conclusions: Despite excellent GP compliance, it was found unfeasible to validate self-reported cardiovascular problems via GPs because they do not serve as gatekeepers in the Swiss health care system. It is thus necessary to develop other validation methods to improve the quality of patient-reported outcomes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Subjects :
- SELF-evaluation
MYOCARDIAL infarction
ANGINA pectoris
CARDIOVASCULAR diseases
TUMORS in children
RESEARCH funding
PILOT projects
QUESTIONNAIRES
HYPERTENSION
DRUG therapy
CANCER patients
PHYSICIANS' attitudes
HEART failure
HEART valve diseases
DESCRIPTIVE statistics
ARRHYTHMIA
INFORMED consent (Medical law)
STATISTICS
STROKE
CONFIDENCE intervals
DATA analysis software
COMPARATIVE studies
THROMBOSIS
INTER-observer reliability
EVALUATION
Subjects
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 27314553
- Volume :
- 25
- Issue :
- 1
- Database :
- Complementary Index
- Journal :
- BMC Primary Care
- Publication Type :
- Academic Journal
- Accession number :
- 175932346
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1186/s12875-024-02322-7