Pretreatment Lymphocyte to C-Reactive Protein Ratio: An Independent Predictor of Overall Survival in Metastatic Hormone-Naïve Prostate Cancer Patients.

In this retrospective study, we studied the impact of lymphocyte to C-reactive protein ratio (LCR) on oncological outcomes of 361 consecutive mHNPC patients treated with surgical castration or pharmacologic castration accompanied by first-generation antiandrogens. The findings suggest that pretreatment low LCR is an independent predictor of poor OS in mHNPC patients. Introduction: The purpose of this study was to investigate the clinical value of combination of systematic inflammatory factors in predicting the outcomes of primary androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) plus first-generation antiandrogen treatment in metastatic hormone-naïve prostate cancer (mHNPC) patients. Materials and Methods: A total of 361 consecutive mHNPC patients from the discovery (n = 165) and validation (n = 196) cohorts were analyzed. All patients received primary ADT with surgical castration or pharmacologic castration accompanied by first-generation antiandrogens. We evaluated the prognostic impact of pretreatment lymphocyte to C-reactive protein ratio (LCR) on overall survival (OS) in both cohorts. Results: The median follow-up in the discovery and validation cohorts was 43.4 and 50.9 months, respectively. In the discovery cohort, low LCR (using an optimal cutoff threshold of 14,025) was significantly correlated with poor OS compared with high LCR (P < .001). Multivariate analysis revealed that the biopsy Gleason score and LCR were independent prognostic factors for OS. In the validation cohort, low LCR was also significantly correlated with poor OS compared with high LCR (P = .001). A multivariate analysis revealed that the extent of disease on bone scan grade, lactate dehydrogenase, and LCR were all independent predictors of OS. Conclusions: Pretreatment low LCR is an independent predictor of poor OS in mHNPC patients. This may be informative in predicting the susceptible patients' developing worse outcomes after being treated with primary ADT plus first-generation antiandrogen. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]