Cite
Comparative Efficacy of Continuous Ceftazidime Infusion vs. Intermittent Bolus against In Vitro Ceftazidime-Susceptible and -Resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa Biofilm.
MLA
El Haj, Cristina, et al. “Comparative Efficacy of Continuous Ceftazidime Infusion vs. Intermittent Bolus against In Vitro Ceftazidime-Susceptible and -Resistant Pseudomonas Aeruginosa Biofilm.” Antibiotics (2079-6382), vol. 13, no. 4, Apr. 2024, p. 344. EBSCOhost, https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics13040344.
APA
El Haj, C., Agustí, E., Benavent, E., Soldevila-Boixader, L., Rigo-Bonnin, R., Tubau, F., Torrejón, B., Esteban, J., & Murillo, O. (2024). Comparative Efficacy of Continuous Ceftazidime Infusion vs. Intermittent Bolus against In Vitro Ceftazidime-Susceptible and -Resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa Biofilm. Antibiotics (2079-6382), 13(4), 344. https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics13040344
Chicago
El Haj, Cristina, Eugènia Agustí, Eva Benavent, Laura Soldevila-Boixader, Raül Rigo-Bonnin, Fe Tubau, Benjamín Torrejón, Jaime Esteban, and Oscar Murillo. 2024. “Comparative Efficacy of Continuous Ceftazidime Infusion vs. Intermittent Bolus against In Vitro Ceftazidime-Susceptible and -Resistant Pseudomonas Aeruginosa Biofilm.” Antibiotics (2079-6382) 13 (4): 344. doi:10.3390/antibiotics13040344.