Intravascular ultrasound-guided versus angiography-guided percutaneous coronary intervention for acute myocardial infarction with cardiogenic shock.

MLA

Lee, Oh-Hyun, et al. “Intravascular Ultrasound-Guided versus Angiography-Guided Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for Acute Myocardial Infarction with Cardiogenic Shock.” Scientific Reports, vol. 14, no. 1, May 2024, pp. 1–10. EBSCOhost, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-59723-y.

APA

Lee, O.-H., Heo, S.-J., Johnson, T. W., Kim, Y., Cho, D.-K., Kim, J.-S., Kim, B.-K., Choi, D., Hong, M.-K., Jang, Y., Jeong, M. H., Ahn, T. H., Seung, K. B., Rha, S.-W., Kim, H.-S., Yoon, C.-H., Gwon, H.-C., Kim, C.-J., Yoon, J., & Seong, I.-W. (2024). Intravascular ultrasound-guided versus angiography-guided percutaneous coronary intervention for acute myocardial infarction with cardiogenic shock. Scientific Reports, 14(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-59723-y

Chicago

Lee, Oh-Hyun, Seok-Jae Heo, Thomas W. Johnson, Yongcheol Kim, Deok-Kyu Cho, Jung-Sun Kim, Byeong-Keuk Kim, et al. 2024. “Intravascular Ultrasound-Guided versus Angiography-Guided Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for Acute Myocardial Infarction with Cardiogenic Shock.” Scientific Reports 14 (1): 1–10. doi:10.1038/s41598-024-59723-y.