WEST VIRGINIA V. EPA, A NEW MAJOR QUESTIONS DOCTRINE OR MAINTAINING THE STATUS QUO? AN APPLICATION TO NET NEUTRALITY.

The article focuses on the Supreme Court case West Virginia v. EPA, which rejected the EPA's expansive interpretation of the Clean Air Act regarding greenhouse gas emissions. It explores the implications of "major questions doctrine" invoked by the Court for first time, impacting not only environmental policy but also administrative law principles. It discusses potential ramifications for net neutrality regulations and examines the development and application of the major questions doctrine.