Back to Search
Start Over
Individualizing Basketball-Specific Interval Training Using Anaerobic Speed Reserve: Effects on Physiological and Hormonal Adaptations.
- Source :
- International Journal of Sports Physiology & Performance; Apr2024, Vol. 19 Issue 4, p365-374, 10p
- Publication Year :
- 2024
-
Abstract
- Purpose: We compared the adaptive responses to supramaximal high-intensity interval training (HIIT) individualized according to anaerobic speed reserve (ASR), the 30-15 Intermittent Fitness Test (V<subscript>IFT</subscript>), and velocity associated with maximum oxygen uptake (MAS) to determine which approach facilitates more identical adaptations across athletes with different profiles. Methods: Thirty national-level basketball players (age = 28.4 [5] y; body mass = 88.9 [6.3] kg; height = 190 [4.8] cm) were randomly assigned to 3 training groups performing 2 sets of 4, 6, 8, 6, 8, and 10-minute runs (from first to sixth week, respectively), consisting of 15-second running at Δ%20ASR (MAS + 0.2 × ASR), 95%V<subscript>IFT</subscript>, and 120%MAS, with 15 seconds recovery between efforts and a 3-minute relief between sets. Results: All 3 interval interventions significantly (P <.05) enhanced maximum oxygen uptake ( V ˙ O 2 max), oxygen pulse ( V ˙ O 2 / HR), first and second ventilatory threshold (VT<subscript>1</subscript> and VT<subscript>2</subscript>), cardiac output ( Q ˙ max ), stroke volume, peak and average power output, testosterone levels, and testosterone-to-cortisol ratio following the training period. Different values of interindividual variability (coefficient of variation) for the percentage changes of the measured variables were observed in response to HIIT<subscript>ASR</subscript>, HIITv<subscript>IFT</subscript>, and HIIT<subscript>MAS</subscript> for V ˙ O 2 max (8.7%, 18.8%, 34.6%, respectively), V ˙ O 2 / HR (9.5%, 15.0%, 28.6%), VT<subscript>1</subscript> (9.6%, 19.6%, 34.6%), VT<subscript>2</subscript> (21.8%, 32.4%, 56.7%), Q ˙ max (8.2%, 16.9%, 28.8%), stroke volume (7.9%, 15.2%, 23.5%), peak power output (20%, 22%, 37.3%), average power output (21.1%, 21.3%, 32.5%), testosterone (52.9%, 61.6%, 59.9%), and testosterone-to-cortisol ratio (55.1%, 59.5%, 57.8%). Conclusions: Supramaximal HIIT performed at Δ%20ASR resulted in more uniform physiological adaptations than HIIT interventions prescribed using V<subscript>IFT</subscript> or MAS. Although hormonal changes do not follow this approach, all the approaches induced an anabolic effect. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Subjects :
- TESTOSTERONE
PHYSIOLOGICAL adaptation
HORMONES
BODY mass index
ANAEROBIC threshold
HIGH-intensity interval training
STATISTICAL sampling
PHYSICAL training & conditioning
AEROBIC capacity
RANDOMIZED controlled trials
HYDROCORTISONE
CARDIAC output
PERSONAL training
BASKETBALL
EXERCISE tests
COMPARATIVE studies
OXYGEN consumption
STROKE volume (Cardiac output)
Subjects
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 15550265
- Volume :
- 19
- Issue :
- 4
- Database :
- Complementary Index
- Journal :
- International Journal of Sports Physiology & Performance
- Publication Type :
- Academic Journal
- Accession number :
- 177461996
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1123/ijspp.2023-0379