Back to Search Start Over

The behavior of Li and B isotopes in high-T and low-T eclogites enclosed by phengite schists.

Authors :
Wang, Dan
Romer, Rolf L.
Liu, Fulai
Glodny, Johannes
Source :
Contributions to Mineralogy & Petrology; May2024, Vol. 179 Issue 5, p1-26, 26p
Publication Year :
2024

Abstract

Subduction zones are critical sites for recycling of Li and B into the mantle. The way of redistribution of Li and B and their isotopes in subduction settings is debated, and there is a lack of detailed studies on Li and B partitioning between minerals of different types of eclogites and the host rocks of the eclogites. We present Li and B concentration data of minerals and Li and B whole-rock isotope data for low-T and high-T eclogites and their phengite schist host rocks from the Changning–Menglian suture zone, SW China. Omphacite controls the Li budget in both the low-T and high-T eclogites. Low-T eclogites have Li and δ<superscript>7</superscript>Li values (8.4–27.0 ppm, – 5.5 to + 3.2 ‰) similar to the phengite schists (8.7–27.0 ppm, – 3.8 to + 3.0 ‰), suggesting that Li was added to low-T eclogites from the phengite schists. In contrast, high-T eclogites have much lower δ<superscript>7</superscript>Li values (– 13.2 to – 5.8 ‰) than the phengite schists, reflecting prograde loss of Li or exchange with wall rocks characterized by low δ<superscript>7</superscript>Li values. Phengite and retrograde amphibole/muscovite are the major B hosts for low-T and high-T eclogites, respectively. The budgets and isotopic compositions of B in eclogites are affected by the infiltration of fluids derived from phengite schists, as indicated by eclogite δ<superscript>11</superscript>B values (– 15.1 to – 8.1 ‰) overlapping with the values of the phengite schists (– 22.8 to – 9.5 ‰). Lithium and B in eclogites are hosted in different mineral phases that may have formed at different stages of metamorphism, implying that the contents and isotopic compositions of Li and B may become decoupled during subduction-related fluid-mediated redistribution. We suggest a mineralogical control on the redistribution of Li and B in eclogites during subduction and the exchange of Li and B with the immediate wall rocks. The observed contrasting Li and B isotopic signatures in eclogites are likely caused by a fluid-mediated exchange with different types of wall rocks during both prograde metamorphism and exhumation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
00107999
Volume :
179
Issue :
5
Database :
Complementary Index
Journal :
Contributions to Mineralogy & Petrology
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
177463411
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00410-024-02124-1