Back to Search
Start Over
Implementation of an enhanced recovery after surgery protocol for colorectal cancer in a regional hospital network supported by audit and feedback: a stepped wedge, cluster randomised trial.
- Source :
- BMJ Quality & Safety; Jun2024, Vol. 33 Issue 6, p363-374, 12p
- Publication Year :
- 2024
-
Abstract
- Background Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols are known to potentially improve the management and outcomes of patients undergoing colorectal surgery, with limited evidence of their implementation in hospital networks and in a large population. We aimed to assess the impact of the implementation of an ERAS protocol in colorectal cancer surgery in the entire region of Piemonte, Italy, supported by an audit and feedback (A&F) intervention. Methods A large, stepped wedge, cluster randomised trial enrolled patients scheduled for elective surgery at 29 general surgery units (clusters). At baseline (first 3 months), standard care was continued in all units. Thereafter, four groups of clusters began to adopt the ERAS protocol successively. By the end of the study, each cluster had a period in which standard care was maintained (control) and a period in which the protocol was applied (experimental). ERAS implementation was supported by initial training and A&F initiatives. The primary endpoint was length of stay (LOS) without outliers (>94th percentile), and the secondary endpoints were outliers for LOS, postoperative medical and surgical complications, quality of recovery and compliance with ERAS items. Results Of 2626 randomised patients, 2397 were included in the LOS analysis (1060 in the control period and 1337 in the experimental period). The mean LOS without outliers was 8.5 days during the control period (SD 3.9) and 7.5 (SD 3.5) during the experimental one. The adjusted difference between the two periods was a reduction of 0.58 days (95% CI -1.07, -0.09; p=0.021). The compliance with ERAS items increased from 52.4% to 67.3% (estimated absolute difference +13%; 95% CI 11.4%, 14.7%). No difference in the occurrence of complications was evidenced (OR 1.22; 95% CI 0.89, 1.68). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Subjects :
- PREVENTION of surgical complications
MEDICAL protocols
AUDITING
PATIENT compliance
HUMAN services programs
CLUSTER analysis (Statistics)
RESEARCH funding
STATISTICAL sampling
COLORECTAL cancer
HOSPITALS
TREATMENT effectiveness
RANDOMIZED controlled trials
DESCRIPTIVE statistics
ENHANCED recovery after surgery protocol
ODDS ratio
ELECTIVE surgery
QUALITY of life
LENGTH of stay in hospitals
CONFIDENCE intervals
DATA analysis software
Subjects
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 20445415
- Volume :
- 33
- Issue :
- 6
- Database :
- Complementary Index
- Journal :
- BMJ Quality & Safety
- Publication Type :
- Academic Journal
- Accession number :
- 178065902
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjqs-2023-016594