Quantifying Volumetric Scattering Bias in ICESat‐2 and Operation IceBridge Altimetry Over Greenland Firn and Aged Snow.

The Ice, Cloud, and Land Elevation Satellite‐2 (ICESat‐2) mission has collected surface elevation measurements for over 5 years. ICESat‐2 carries an instrument that emits laser light at 532 nm, and ice and snow absorb weakly at this wavelength. Previous modeling studies found that melting snow could induce significant bias to altimetry signals, but there is no formal assessment on ICESat‐2 acquisitions during the melting season. We performed two case studies over the Greenland Ice Sheet to quantify bias in ICESat‐2 signals over snow: one to validate Airborne Topographic Mapper (ATM) data against Next Generation Airborne Visible/Infrared Imaging Spectrometer (AVIRIS‐NG) grain sizes, and a second to estimate ICESat‐2 bias relative to ATM. We used snow optical grain sizes derived from ATM and AVIRIS‐NG to attribute altimetry bias to snowpack properties. For the first case study, the mean and standard deviation of optical grain sizes were 340 ± 65 µm (AVIRIS‐NG) and 670 ± 420 µm (ATM). A mean altimetry bias of 4.81 ± 1.76 cm was found for ATM, with larger biases linked to increases in grain size. In the second case study, we found a mean grain size of 910 ± 381 µm and biases of 6.42 ± 1.77 cm (ICESat‐2) and 9.82 ± 0.97 cm (ATM). The grain sizes and densities needed to recreate biases with a model are uncommon in nature, so we propose that additional surface attributes must be considered to characterize ICESat‐2 bias over snow. The altimetry biases are within the accuracy requirements of the ICESat‐2 mission, but we cannot rule out more significant errors over coarse‐grained snow. Plain Language Summary: The Ice, Cloud, and Land Elevation Satellite‐2 (ICESat‐2) mission has been used to measure changes in land ice, vegetation cover, and sea ice, and there is growing interest to use ICESat‐2 for snow science. ICESat‐2 uses a green laser to estimate the elevation of the Earth's surface, and recent work has shown that snow can introduce errors in green laser measurements such as ICESat‐2. In this study, we used ICESat‐2 and airborne data to (a) identify errors in the ICESat‐2 data and (b) link the errors to snow properties over the Greenland Ice Sheet. We found that ICESat‐2 errors are linked to two snow properties: the size of individual snow grains and the density of the snow. Two retrieval methods were used to estimate snow grain size, though the methods show significant differences when large snow grains are observed. Snow grain size and density are insufficient to fully explain ICESat‐2 biases, so we propose that other factors also play a role. The ICESat‐2 errors are within the accuracy requirements of ICESat‐2, but more significant errors may be possible during the Northern Hemisphere melting season. Key Points: Very large snow grains and densities are needed to explain centimeter‐level differences between ICESat‐2 and airborne lidarBiases from snow grain size and other factors may be influenced by different height measurement methods between ICESat‐2 and airborne lidarSnow grain size retrievals strongly differ between airborne lidar and AVIRIS‐NG over regions with coarse‐grained snow [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]