Regulating and Directing the Healthy Development of Various Types of Capital in China under the Guidance of the Capital View of Historical Materialism.

Only by adhering to the scientific concept of capital as explained by Marx in Capital, and by drawing a clear line between the two different views of capital based on materialist and idealist conceptions of history, can we understand the phenomenon of capital in the real economy of contemporary China. In the real economy of developing commodity production, public and private capital share some common features, but there are differences in their nature. The misunderstanding, created by Western bourgeois economics, of the relationship between public and private capital harms efforts to achieve a scientific regulation of the healthy development of various types of capital, and needs to be clarified. Where the practical work of regulating and guiding the healthy development of capital is concerned, great importance should be attached to restoring and guaranteeing the dominant position of public capital within social capital as a whole; to ensuring that state-owned capital effectively fulfills the dominant role; to strictly governing the otherwise disorderly development of private capital; to strengthening control over the quantity and quality of foreign capital introduced to the economy; and to keeping state-owned capital firmly in control of the national financial system. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]