Back to Search
Start Over
Towards the standardisation of adult person‐reported outcome domains in diabetes research: A Consensus Statement development panel.
- Source :
- Diabetic Medicine; Aug2024, Vol. 41 Issue 8, p1-15, 15p
- Publication Year :
- 2024
-
Abstract
- Diabetes is unique among chronic diseases because clinical outcomes are intimately tied to how the person living with diabetes reacts to and implements treatment recommendations. It is further characterised by widespread social stigma, judgement and paternalism. This physical, social and psychological burden collectively influences self‐management behaviours. It is widely recognised that the individual's perspective about the impact of trying to manage the disease and the burden that self‐management confers must be addressed to achieve optimal health outcomes. Standardised, rigorous assessment of mental and behavioural health status, in interaction with physical health outcomes is crucial to aid understanding of person‐reported outcomes (PROs). Whilst tempting to conceptualise PROs as an issue of perceived quality of life (QoL), in fact health‐related QoL is multi‐dimensional and covers indicators of physical or functional health status, psychological and social well‐being. This complexity is illuminated by the large number of person reported outcome measures (PROMs) that have been developed across multiple psychosocial domains. Often measures are used inappropriately or because they have been used in the scientific literature rather than based on methodological or outcome assessment rigour. Given the broad nature of psychosocial functioning/mental health, it is important to broadly define PROs that are evaluated in the context of therapeutic interventions, real‐life and observational studies. This report summarises the central themes and lessons derived in the assessment and use of PROMs amongst adults with diabetes. Effective assessment of PROMs routinely in clinical research is crucial to understanding the true impact of any intervention. Selecting appropriate measures, relevant to the specific factors of PROs important in the research study will provide valuable data alongside physical health data. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Subjects :
- TYPE 1 diabetes
CONSENSUS (Social sciences)
SELF-evaluation
FEAR
PATIENT compliance
HEALTH status indicators
SELF-management (Psychology)
PSYCHOLOGICAL distress
INSULIN sensitivity
ATTITUDES toward illness
FUNCTIONAL status
SLEEP duration
TYPE 2 diabetes
QUALITY of life
CONTINUOUS glucose monitoring
HEALTH outcome assessment
PATIENT satisfaction
DRUGS
SLEEP quality
DIABETES
WELL-being
MENTAL depression
PSYCHOSOCIAL functioning
SEXUAL health
SOCIAL stigma
HYPOGLYCEMIA
PATIENTS' attitudes
STANDARDS
ADULTS
Subjects
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 07423071
- Volume :
- 41
- Issue :
- 8
- Database :
- Complementary Index
- Journal :
- Diabetic Medicine
- Publication Type :
- Academic Journal
- Accession number :
- 178557991
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1111/dme.15332