Back to Search Start Over

Qualitative studies involving users of clinical neurotechnology: a scoping review.

Authors :
Starke, Georg
Akmazoglu, Tugba Basaran
Colucci, Annalisa
Vermehren, Mareike
van Beinum, Amanda
Buthut, Maria
Soekadar, Surjo R.
Bublitz, Christoph
Chandler, Jennifer A.
Ienca, Marcello
Source :
BMC Medical Ethics; 8/14/2024, Vol. 25 Issue 1, p1-14, 14p
Publication Year :
2024

Abstract

Background: The rise of a new generation of intelligent neuroprostheses, brain-computer interfaces (BCI) and adaptive closed-loop brain stimulation devices hastens the clinical deployment of neurotechnologies to treat neurological and neuropsychiatric disorders. However, it remains unclear how these nascent technologies may impact the subjective experience of their users. To inform this debate, it is crucial to have a solid understanding how more established current technologies already affect their users. In recent years, researchers have used qualitative research methods to explore the subjective experience of individuals who become users of clinical neurotechnology. Yet, a synthesis of these more recent findings focusing on qualitative methods is still lacking. Methods: To address this gap in the literature, we systematically searched five databases for original research articles that investigated subjective experiences of persons using or receiving neuroprosthetics, BCIs or neuromodulation with qualitative interviews and raised normative questions. Results: 36 research articles were included and analysed using qualitative content analysis. Our findings synthesise the current scientific literature and reveal a pronounced focus on usability and other technical aspects of user experience. In parallel, they highlight a relative neglect of considerations regarding agency, self-perception, personal identity and subjective experience. Conclusions: Our synthesis of the existing qualitative literature on clinical neurotechnology highlights the need to expand the current methodological focus as to investigate also non-technical aspects of user experience. Given the critical role considerations of agency, self-perception and personal identity play in assessing the ethical and legal significance of these technologies, our findings reveal a critical gap in the existing literature. This review provides a comprehensive synthesis of the current qualitative research landscape on neurotechnology and the limitations thereof. These findings can inform researchers on how to study the subjective experience of neurotechnology users more holistically and build patient-centred neurotechnology. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
14726939
Volume :
25
Issue :
1
Database :
Complementary Index
Journal :
BMC Medical Ethics
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
179039040
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12910-024-01087-z