Back to Search Start Over

Experiences of dental behaviour support techniques: A qualitative systematic review.

Authors :
Geddis‐Regan, Andrew
Fisal, Aisyah Binti Ahmad
Bird, James
Fleischmann, Isabel
Mac Giolla Phadraig, Caoimhin
Source :
Community Dentistry & Oral Epidemiology; Oct2024, Vol. 52 Issue 5, p660-676, 17p
Publication Year :
2024

Abstract

Background: Little is known about patients' or carers' reported experiences of dental care provided using dental behaviour support (DBS) techniques. Qualitative literature can provide unique insight into these experiences. Aim: To explore and synthesize qualitative literature related to patient experience of dental behaviour support. Methods: A PROSPERO‐registered systematic review of qualitative articles was undertaken. Studies were identified through MEDLINE, Embase and PsycINFO. Abstracts were screened by two reviewers and data were extracted to summarize the qualitative findings included within them. A thematic summary approach was used to synthesize the qualitative data identified. Results: Twenty‐three studies were included. Studies primarily explored experiences of dental care of children by speaking to their parents (n = 16), particularly regarding paediatric dental general anaesthesia (DGA) (n = 8). Studies of adults' experiences of DBS (n = 7) covered a range of techniques. Nine studies explored broader dental care experiences and did not study specific DBS approaches. A thematic synthesis identified five themes applicable across the studies identified: Trust and the therapeutic alliance supporting effective care delivery; considered information sharing often alleviated anticipatory anxiety; control and autonomy‐reduced anxieties; variations in the perceived treatment successes and failures of DBS techniques; and DBS techniques produced longer positive and negative impacts on patients beyond direct care provision. Conclusion: Qualitative research has been under‐utilized in research on DBS techniques. Care experiences of most DBS techniques outside of paediatric DGA are poorly understood. Building trust with patients and enabling autonomy appear to support positive patient‐reported experiences of care. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
03015661
Volume :
52
Issue :
5
Database :
Complementary Index
Journal :
Community Dentistry & Oral Epidemiology
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
179412151
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1111/cdoe.12969