Back to Search
Start Over
Treatment of Multiple Adjacent Gingival Recessions with a Coronally Advanced Flap vs a Modified Coronally Advanced Tunnel with a Volumetrically Stable Collagen Matrix: A 12-Month Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial.
- Source :
- International Journal of Periodontics & Restorative Dentistry; Sep/Oct2024, Vol. 44 Issue 5, p499-509, 12p
- Publication Year :
- 2024
-
Abstract
- The introduction of a new collagen substitute, which will potentially reduce the invasiveness of techniques by avoiding the need for a second surgical site (ie, the donor site), needs to be evaluated in relation to the surgical procedure that could benefit the most by utilizing such a matrix. This study compared the clinical outcomes following treatment of RT1 multiple adjacent gingival recessions (MAGRs) using the modified coronally advanced tunnel (MCAT) technique or the multiple coronally advanced flap (MCAF) in conjunction with a new volume-stable xenogeneic collagen matrix (VXCM). Secondarily, the study evaluated whether patients report a preference between the two surgical techniques in terms of discomfort. A total of 20 patients requiring treatment of MAGRs were randomly assigned to one of the two treatment groups: MCAF+VCMX (Group A) or MCAT+VCMX (Group B). The following measurements were recorded at baseline (before surgery) and at 6 and 12 months: gingival recession depth (REC), probing pocket depth (PD), keratinized tissue width (KTW), and gingival thickness (GT). Postoperative pain and discomfort were recorded using a visual analog scale (VAS) at 1 week. The primary outcome variable was mean root coverage (mRC), and secondary outcomes were complete root coverage (CRC), changes in KTW and GT, patient discomfort and satisfaction, and duration of surgery. Healing was uneventful in both groups. At 12 months, both treatments resulted in statistically significant improvements in REC and GT compared to baseline (P < .05). The mRC was 79.95% ± 29.92% in the MCAF group and 64.74% ± 40.5% in the MCAT group (P = .124). CRC was seen in 65.6% of MCAF-treated sites and 52% of MCAT-treated sites (P = .181). Similar clinical results should be expected when MAGRs are treated with MCAF or MCAT, with the adjunct of VCMX. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Subjects :
- POSTOPERATIVE care
RESEARCH funding
STATISTICAL sampling
PERIODONTAL disease
VISUAL analog scale
GINGIVITIS
POSTOPERATIVE pain
GINGIVAL recession
TREATMENT effectiveness
RANDOMIZED controlled trials
MINIMALLY invasive procedures
DESCRIPTIVE statistics
SURGICAL flaps
LONGITUDINAL method
COLLAGEN
PATIENT satisfaction
COMPARATIVE studies
Subjects
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 01987569
- Volume :
- 44
- Issue :
- 5
- Database :
- Complementary Index
- Journal :
- International Journal of Periodontics & Restorative Dentistry
- Publication Type :
- Academic Journal
- Accession number :
- 179671941
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.11607/prd.6796