Back to Search Start Over

Wearable Devices Based on Bioimpedance Test in Heart Failure: Clinical Relevance: Systematic Review.

Authors :
Giménez-Miranda, Luis
Scagliusi, Santiago F.
Pérez-García, Pablo
Olmo-Fernández, Alberto
Huertas, Gloria
Yúfera, Alberto
Medrano, Francisco J.
Source :
Reviews in Cardiovascular Medicine; Sep2024, Vol. 25 Issue 9, p1-9, 9p
Publication Year :
2024

Abstract

Background: Heart failure (HF) represents a frequent cause of hospital admission, with fluid overload directly contributing to decompensations. Bioimpedance (BI), a physical parameter linked to tissue hydration status, holds promise in monitoring congestion and improving prognosis. This systematic review aimed to assess the clinical relevance of BI-based wearable devices for HF fluid monitoring. Methods: A systematic review of the published literature was conducted in five medical databases (PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane, Web of Science, and Embase) for studies assessing wearable BI-measuring devices on HF patients following PRISMA recommendations on February 4th, 2024. The risk of bias was evaluated using the ROBINS tool. Results: The review included 10 articles with 535 participants (mean age 66.7 ± 8.9 years, males 70.4%). Three articles identified significant BI value differences between HF patients and controls or congestive vs non-congestive HF patients. Four articles focused on the devices’ ability to predict HF worsening-related events, revealing an overall sensitivity of 70.0 (95% CI 68.8–71.1) and specificity of 89.1 (95% CI 88.3–89.9). One article assessed prognosis, showing that R80kHz decrease was related to all-cause-mortality with a hazard ratio (HR) of 5.51 (95% CI 1.55–23.32; p = 0.02) and the composite all-causemortality and HF admission with a HR of 4.96 (95% CI 1.82–14.37; p = 0.01). Conclusions: BI-measuring wearable devices exhibit efficacy in detecting fluid overload and hold promise for HF monitoring. However, further studies and technological improvements are required to optimize their impact on prognosis compared to standard care before they can be routinely implemented in clinical practice. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
15306550
Volume :
25
Issue :
9
Database :
Complementary Index
Journal :
Reviews in Cardiovascular Medicine
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
180102917
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.31083/j.rcm2509315