Back to Search Start Over

Reliability of Magseed® marking before neoadjuvant systemic therapy with subsequent contrast-enhanced mammography in patients with non-palpable breast cancer lesions after treatment: the MAGMA study.

Authors :
Bravo, Eva Iglesias
Martínez, Antonio Mariscal
Alvà, Helena Peris
Sancho, Diego Riol
López, José Carlos Antela
Sánchez, Joel Aranda
Casa, Pilar Escobar
de las Heras, Cristina Gómez
Venegas, María Antonia Fernández
Vidal, Eduarda García
Begines, Elisabeth Delgado
Mur, Carmen García
Vicente, Isabel
Casamayor, Carmen
Cruz, Silvia
Barrado, Anabel García
Source :
Breast Cancer Research & Treatment; Nov2024, Vol. 208 Issue 1, p133-143, 11p
Publication Year :
2024

Abstract

Purpose: To assess the reliability of excising residual breast cancer lesions after neoadjuvant systemic therapy (NAST) using a previously localized paramagnetic seed (Magseed®) and the subsequent use of contrast-enhanced spectral mammography (CESM) to evaluate response. Methods: Observational, prospective, multicenter study including adult women (> 18 years) with invasive breast carcinoma undergoing NAST between January 2022 and February 2023 with non-palpable tumor lesions at surgery. Radiologists marked tumors with Magseed® during biopsy before NAST, and surgeons excised tumors guided by the Sentimag® magnetometer. CESMs were performed before and after NAST to evaluate tumor response (Response Evaluation Criteria for Solid Tumors [RECIST]). We considered intraoperative, surgical, and CESM-related variables and histological response. Results: We analyzed 109 patients (median [IQR] age of 55.0 [46.0, 65.0] years). Magseed® was retrieved from breast tumors in all surgeries (100%; 95% CI 95.47–100.0%) with no displacement and was identified by radiology in 106 patients (97.24%), a median (IQR) of 176.5 (150.0, 216.3) days after marking. Most surgeries (94.49%) were conservative; they lasted a median (IQR) of 22.5 (14.75, 40.0) min (95% CI 23.59–30.11 min). Most dissected tumor margins (93.57%) were negative, and few patients (5.51%) needed reintervention. Magseed® was identified using CESM in all patients (100%); RECIST responses correlated with histopathological evaluations of dissected tumors using the Miller–Payne response grade (p < 0.0001) and residual lesion diameter (p < 0.0001). Also 69 patients (63.3%) answered a patient's satisfaction survey and 98.8% of them felt very satisfied with the entire procedure. Conclusion: Long-term marking of breast cancer lesions with Magseed® is a reliable and feasible method in patients undergoing NAST and may be used with subsequent CESM. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
01676806
Volume :
208
Issue :
1
Database :
Complementary Index
Journal :
Breast Cancer Research & Treatment
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
180104725
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-024-07407-6